UAB
American Athletic
2024-25 - 2025-26 - 2026-27
Switch to All-time Team Page
All team stats adjusted for opponents. See methodology page for details.

Predictive Rating +2.5 124
Results Rating +2.9 120
Consistency 0.15 151
Pace 72.4 75
Improvement -1.8 252

Overall 1st FGA Second Chance TOs Free
throws		 Shot Selection
Offense C 153 D+ C A C C
Defense C+ 119 C B+ C B+ C

Offense Breakdown
Attempts Conversion Rate Total Effect
Close Shots 46% 19 C+ 60% 125 +5.1 26
2 Pt. Jumpers 52% 42 D+ 35% 276 +0.6 139
Three Pointers 29% 355 F 28% 363 -8.6 360
Shot Selection/Accuracy C +0.0 190 D+ -2.7 278
1st FG Attempt D+ 0.97 260
Second Chance C+ 31.7% 135 C- 1.00 232 C 0.32 161
Opponents' Steals B+ 7.3% 16
Other Turnovers A 4.6% 2
Turnovers A 11.9% 4
Freethrows C 0.31 178 C- 71% 230 C 0.22 191
Total Offense C +0.5 153

Assists Opponents' Blocks
Close Shots C 49% 174 B- 9.2% 86
2 Pt. Jumpers Shots B 35% 51 F+ 8.7% 344
Three Pointers C- 82% 228 B 0.3% 43
Total C- 52% 255 D+ 6.4% 283


Defense Breakdown
Attempts Conversion Rate Total Effect
Close Shots 38% 209 C- 59% 213 +0.0 178
2 Pt. Jumpers 21% 156 B- 35% 73 -0.4 155
Three Pointers 41% 165 C 34% 186 +0.2 193
Shot Selection/Accuracy C -0.1 142 C -0.2 171
1st FG Attempt C 1.02 161
Second Chance B 26.4% 49 B 0.94 51 B+ 0.25 36
Turnovers from Steals B- 10.7% 86
Other Turnovers F+ 5.6% 352
Turnovers C 16.3% 202
Freethrows B+ 0.24 17 C 73% 217 B+ 0.17 28
Total Defense C+ +2.0 119

Assists Blocks
Close Shots C- 51% 245 C- 9.7% 222
2 Pt. Jumpers Shots B- 22% 111 B- 6.5% 82
Three Pointers C+ 81% 113 B- 1.3% 77
Total C 56% 190 C 5.6% 173

Miscellaneous
Offense Defense
Possession Length 16.5 87 17.4 198
Fast Break Points Per Possession 0.24 28 0.17 189
Consistency 0.11 49 0.12 151
Improvement -2.2 299 +0.5 162

NCAA Tournament Selection
At-Large Selection Status Out of Consideration
Projected Seeding Not in Tournament  

Prediction Ranges
Pessimistic
5th Percentile 		Expected
50th Percentile 		Optimistic
95th Percentile
Predictive Rating Rank 124 124 123
Results Rating Rank 120 119 119
Conference Record 11 - 7 11 - 7 11 - 7
Conference Finish 4 4 4
NCAA Tourney Seed None None None
NCAA Tourney Finish None None None

NowWin NextLose Next
#1 Overall Seed 0% n/a n/a
#1 Seed 0% n/a n/a
Top 2 Seed 0% n/a n/a
Top 4 Seed 0% n/a n/a
Top 6 Seed 0% n/a n/a
NCAA Tourney Bid 0% n/a n/a
At-Large Bid if not Auto Qualifier 0% n/a n/a
Average Seed n/a n/a n/a
.500 or above 0% n/a n/a
.500 or above in Conference 100% 100% 100.0%
Conference Champion 0% 0% 0.0%
Last Place in Conference 0% 0% 0.0%
First Four0% n/a n/a
First Round0% n/a n/a
Second Round0% n/a n/a
Sweet Sixteen0% n/a n/a
Elite Eight0% n/a n/a
Final Four0% n/a n/a
Championship Game0% n/a n/a
National Champion0% n/a n/a

Projected Record by Quadrant
QuadProjectedProjected Cumulative
Quad 1a0 - 10 - 1
Quad 1b2 - 02 - 1
Quad 22 - 24 - 3
Quad 36 - 710 - 10
Quad 49 - 219 - 12


Date Opponent Result/Prediction Lead Record Total Rating Offense Defense
Avg Time Overall Conf Total First
FGA		 2nd Chance TOs Total First
FGA		 2nd Chance TOs
 Mon, Nov 3 365 Mississippi Valley W 106 - 55 99% +29  96% 1 - 0 A+ +25 C+ +2 D C+ A+ A+ +15 A+ B A+
 Fri, Nov 7 34 @North Carolina St. L 70 - 94 10% -11  9% 1 - 1 D+ -7 D -5 F+ B B- C -1 D- F A+
 Tue, Nov 11 324 Alabama St. L 74 - 77 92% -4  21% 1 - 2 F+ -16 F -11 F C- B- D -6 D- A- D-
 Fri, Nov 14 92 High Point W 91 - 74 49% +3  71% 2 - 2 A +20 B- +5 B F+ A+ A+ +13 A- A+ A
 Fri, Nov 21 206 South Alabama W 80 - 72 77% +5  86% 3 - 2 C+ +3 A- +10 B+ B- A- D- -7 D+ A- F
 Mon, Nov 24 122 Southern Illinois W 81 - 73 50% +5  85% 4 - 2 B +11 A +12 C A+ A+ C -1 C+ A- F
 Tue, Nov 25 261 UTEP W 75 - 59 78% +7  83% 5 - 2 B +10 B +7 F+ A- A+ B +5 D+ A A-
 Mon, Dec 1 167 @Middle Tennessee L 61 - 76 49% -4  46% 5 - 3 D- -12 F+ -10 F A+ D+ D+ -3 B- F+ D+
 Fri, Dec 5 187 @Drake W 74 - 69 54% +2  78% 6 - 3 B- +6 C -0 D- B+ D+ B+ +7 A B D-
 Sun, Dec 14 142 Troy L 85 - 86 67% -0  43% 6 - 4 C- -3 A- +11 A A B F -14 F B- F
 Wed, Dec 17 319 Cleveland St. W 101 - 77 92% +7  72% 7 - 4 B +11 B+ +9 B C A+ C+ +1 F+ A+ B-
 Sun, Dec 21 236 UNC Asheville W 72 - 47 83% +13  87% 8 - 4 A- +17 C- -0 D+ D+ A+ A+ +20 A A+ B+
 Wed, Dec 31 87 Wichita St. L 70 - 75 46% +6  88% 8 - 5 0 - 1 C -1 C+ +3 D+ B- A+ D+ -4 D+ D B
 Sun, Jan 4 53 @South Florida W 109 - 106 2OT 15% -3  19% 9 - 5 1 - 1 A- +17 A- +10 C- F+ A+ B+ +6 C- A C-
 Wed, Jan 7 128 Florida Atlantic L 71 - 76 63% -7  3% 9 - 6 1 - 2 D+ -6 D- -7 F B- C C+ +2 A+ C D+
 Sun, Jan 11 235 @East Carolina W 87 - 85 OT 65% +2  59% 10 - 6 2 - 2 C +1 C- -2 F+ C A+ B- +2 D+ B B+
 Wed, Jan 14 205 @Tulane W 82 - 69 57% +4  79% 11 - 6 3 - 2 B+ +14 B +7 D+ A+ B+ B+ +7 B+ D- C
 Sun, Jan 18 65 Tulsa L 77 - 99 36% -10  0% 11 - 7 3 - 3 F+ -16 C- -1 C- F+ A+ F -15 F A C-
 Thu, Jan 22 53 South Florida L 69 - 82 31% -8  3% 11 - 8 3 - 4 D+ -5 D- -8 F A- A+ B +4 C+ C A+
 Wed, Jan 28 335 @Texas San Antonio W 83 - 73 86% +1  63% 12 - 8 4 - 4 C +1 C+ +2 C+ D- A+ C- -2 B- C- F+
 Sat, Jan 31 135 @North Texas W 72 - 68 42% +0  41% 13 - 8 5 - 4 B +9 B +7 A C+ A C+ +2 B- A+ F
 Thu, Feb 5 129 Memphis L 80 - 90 63% -8  2% 13 - 9 5 - 5 D -11 D+ -4 D- B A- D -6 F A B-
 Sun, Feb 8 224 Rice W 71 - 65 81% -1  31% 14 - 9 6 - 5 C -1 D -5 D- C+ A+ B +5 B B C-
 Wed, Feb 11 65 @Tulsa W 68 - 63 18% +4  80% 15 - 9 7 - 5 A- +17 C- -1 F+ C A+ A+ +19 A- A+ A+
 Sun, Feb 15 205 Tulane L 54 - 55 77% -5  16% 15 - 10 7 - 6 D+ -6 F -18 F F A A+ +11 B A+ B-
 Wed, Feb 18 150 @Temple W 76 - 71 46% +2  64% 16 - 10 8 - 6 B +9 B +6 B+ F A+ B- +3 B+ C- F
 Sun, Feb 22 129 @Memphis W 78 - 67 40% +9  84% 17 - 10 9 - 6 A- +16 B- +5 B F B+ A +11 C A B
 Sun, Mar 1 135 North Texas L 58 - 62 65% +2  68% 17 - 11 9 - 7 D+ -5 D- -8 D+ F A- B- +2 A- F+ F+
 Wed, Mar 4 169 @Charlotte W 80 - 74 49% -2  19% 18 - 11 10 - 7 B +9 A- +11 D A+ A C -1 F+ A+ F
 Sun, Mar 8 235 East Carolina W 90 - 83 83% -2  20% 19 - 11 11 - 7 C -0 B- +5 A- F A+ D -6 B- F D+
 Fri, Mar 13 169 Charlotte L 78 - 83 61% -1  37% 19 - 12 D+ -5 C+ +3 C+ C- A+ F+ -9 F B- F
Totals 19 - 12 11 - 7 +3 C +0 A+ D+ C C+ +2 F C- C



Game Detail
Grades are adjusted for opponent strength in each category. Game stats are not adjusted for oppoent strength. See methodology page for descriptions of rating types.
Offense Defense
Tot Off First Field Goal Attempt Second Chance TOs Freethrows Tot Def First Field Goal Attempt Second Chance TOs Freethrows
Shot Accuracy Shot Selection Points Per Shot Shot Accuracy Shot Selection Points Per Shot
2 C 2 L 3 Tot 2 C 2 L 3 Tot Off Reb PPP Tot Att Perc Tot 2 C 2 L 3 Tot 2 C 2 L 3 Tot Off Reb PPP Tot Att Perc Tot
Season Ratings C C+ D+ F D+ 46% 52% 29% C D+ C+ C- C A C C- C C+ C- B- C C 38% 21% 41% C C B B B+ C B+ C B+
1.09 60% 35% 28% -3 0 0.97 32% 1.0 .32 12% .31 71% .22 1.06 59% 35% 34% 0 0 1.02 26% 0.9 .25 16% .24 73% .22
Nov
3		 Mississippi Valley C+ A+ F F D 35% 27% 38% D- D D+ A C+ A+ A- F C- A+ B+ A+ A+ A+ 26% 32% 42% D A+ A+ F B A+ D F F
1.25 77% 29% 29% +2 -1 1.03 34% 1.5 .50 9% .48 62% .30 0.65 46% 13% 24% -18 -2 0.62 13% 1.2 .15 31% .32 95% .31
Nov
7		 North Carolina St. D C- A+ F F 45% 19% 36% C+ F+ A+ F+ B B- F+ F F C F F C+ D- 38% 12% 50% C- D- F D- F A+ D+ D- D-
0.94 54% 55% 14% -9 +1 0.84 39% 0.8 .32 19% .23 57% .13 1.26 80% 50% 35% +10 +1 1.25 38% 1.4 .52 19% .36 82% .30
Nov
11		 Alabama St. F D+ B F F 51% 20% 29% C+ F B- F+ C- B- F B D- D F+ A+ C D- 45% 18% 38% F+ D- C A+ A- D- D B C-
0.99 57% 42% 12% -10 +1 0.85 36% 0.9 .33 16% .29 78% .22 1.03 64% 20% 33% -1 +1 1.02 30% 0.6 .18 15% .31 65% .20
Nov
14		 High Point B- B A+ D B+ 48% 27% 25% D+ B D- F+ F+ A+ A+ B+ A+ A+ F+ B+ A+ A 42% 18% 40% B- A- B A+ A+ A F B+ F
1.16 64% 50% 31% +5 0 1.12 26% 0.9 .24 14% .52 77% .40 0.95 70% 30% 18% -6 +1 0.91 28% 0.7 .20 19% .49 71% .35
Nov
21		 South Alabama A- A+ A+ D A- 30% 15% 55% C- B+ A- F+ B- A- A+ F A D- D- A- C D 42% 21% 38% B- D+ B+ A A- F F A- F+
1.25 79% 57% 31% +6 0 1.15 39% 0.9 .37 14% .38 62% .24 1.13 65% 30% 33% +1 0 1.04 18% 1.0 .18 5% .44 59% .26
Nov
24		 Southern Illinois A D+ C C+ C+ 35% 33% 33% F+ C A A+ A+ A+ B+ C B C F D- A+ C+ 34% 29% 36% B- C+ B+ A A- F A F B-
1.15 53% 39% 33% -2 -2 0.95 38% 1.3 .50 13% .33 70% .23 1.04 70% 47% 19% -1 -1 0.97 26% 0.7 .18 11% .21 85% .18
Nov
25		 UTEP B B F F F 48% 33% 20% C- F+ A+ F A- A+ A+ C A+ B C C+ D D+ 23% 27% 50% C+ D+ A+ A A A- D+ D- D
1.19 64% 20% 22% -7 -1 0.87 54% 0.9 .46 11% .61 74% .45 0.93 60% 33% 36% +1 -2 1.00 16% 0.8 .13 21% .30 73% .22
Dec
1		 Middle Tennessee F+ F D F F 36% 18% 46% C F A A A+ D+ D- B- D D+ C A+ D B 42% 23% 36% D B- C+ F F+ D+ B+ F C
0.92 33% 33% 22% -18 0 0.66 37% 1.3 .46 17% .25 79% .20 1.15 59% 25% 37% -1 0 1.00 29% 1.3 .38 15% .21 83% .18
Dec
5		 Drake C A D- F D- 36% 36% 28% D- D- A- C+ B+ D+ A+ B+ A+ B+ B- A+ D A 36% 24% 40% C A B B B D- B D C+
1.08 71% 29% 23% -3 -2 0.91 38% 1.0 .38 16% .49 75% .37 1.01 55% 8% 36% -7 -1 0.87 23% 1.0 .23 12% .26 75% .20
Dec
14		 Troy A- B+ A+ A A+ 37% 26% 37% D+ A C- A+ A B D- D+ D- F A C- F F 42% 9% 49% C- F A F+ B- F B C- B-
1.25 65% 57% 40% +11 -1 1.22 31% 1.4 .45 15% .22 69% .16 1.27 45% 40% 50% +7 +2 1.19 27% 1.1 .30 12% .27 75% .20
Dec
17		 Cleveland St. B+ B+ D- B+ C+ 56% 11% 33% A B C C- C A+ A+ F B+ C+ A A+ F D- 47% 8% 45% F F+ A+ A+ A+ B- B+ F C
1.37 71% 33% 39% +9 +3 1.25 36% 1.1 .39 9% .43 66% .28 1.04 44% 25% 54% +6 +2 1.19 16% 0.0 .00 19% .25 93% .23
Dec
21		 UNC Asheville C- C- F C- D 62% 15% 23% A- D+ C+ F D+ A+ C- C- C- A+ A D A+ B+ 18% 55% 27% A+ A A+ A+ A+ B+ A+ B- A+
1.12 56% 25% 33% -3 +2 1.00 32% 0.8 .24 8% .30 67% .20 0.73 44% 44% 23% -3 -6 0.84 19% 0.0 .00 20% .18 67% .12
Dec
31		 Wichita St. C+ B F F D+ 47% 33% 20% B- D+ C+ A- B- A+ A+ C+ A+ D+ F A+ F D- 36% 30% 34% B+ D+ D D+ D B B- F+ C
1.08 63% 29% 20% -5 -1 0.90 29% 1.1 .31 11% .41 71% .29 1.15 72% 7% 47% +2 -1 1.04 43% 1.1 .46 17% .30 75% .22
Jan
4		 South Florida A- B F A C- 51% 28% 20% B- C- F+ F F+ A+ A+ B- A+ B+ C- B C- D+ 39% 9% 52% B C- A B+ A C- F+ A+ C-
1.13 61% 14% 40% -4 0 0.95 21% 0.8 .16 8% .48 72% .35 1.10 58% 33% 34% 0 +2 1.04 31% 1.0 .31 14% .43 64% .28
Jan
7		 Florida Atlantic D- F F F F 42% 25% 34% D F C- A+ B- C A+ C- A+ C+ A+ F A+ A+ 34% 13% 53% D+ A+ B+ F+ C D+ F F F
0.96 41% 23% 28% -14 0 0.74 24% 1.3 .31 16% .45 71% .32 1.03 44% 57% 25% -9 +1 0.85 28% 1.2 .33 16% .39 79% .31
Jan
11		 East Carolina C- F B+ F F 55% 25% 20% B F+ D+ A C A+ C+ F C- B- D- A+ D- D 33% 32% 35% B+ D+ C- A B B+ C B+ B-
1.04 49% 44% 23% -7 +1 0.89 27% 1.3 .36 10% .28 67% .19 1.02 62% 25% 36% -2 -2 0.95 35% 0.9 .30 20% .35 65% .23
Jan
14		 Tulane B C- F A+ D+ 55% 28% 17% C+ D+ A A+ A+ B+ C- A+ A- B+ B- D- A+ A- 40% 13% 47% D B+ C+ F D- C B B B+
1.17 55% 27% 44% -2 0 0.98 44% 1.2 .53 14% .30 94% .28 0.99 55% 43% 23% -9 +1 0.87 21% 1.5 .32 14% .32 74% .23
Jan
18		 Tulsa C- B+ D C C+ 38% 41% 21% F C- D+ F F+ A+ A- C B+ F F F F F 49% 10% 41% C- F A B A C- A+ F A+
1.08 67% 30% 33% 0 -3 0.96 23% 0.9 .20 7% .33 73% .24 1.38 72% 67% 46% +17 +2 1.41 24% 1.2 .28 14% .16 90% .15
Jan
22		 South Florida D- F F F F 37% 29% 35% D+ F A C+ A- A+ A- A+ A+ B A+ F F+ C+ 39% 4% 57% C C+ C C C A+ C+ A+ A-
0.91 39% 28% 18% -18 -1 0.63 40% 1.0 .38 13% .38 84% .32 1.08 38% 50% 39% -3 +2 1.00 38% 1.1 .43 21% .35 62% .22
Jan
28		 Texas San Antonio C+ C+ A+ D- B- 37% 29% 35% F+ C+ F+ C D- A+ A+ F+ A+ C- A- C B+ C+ 34% 24% 42% B B- B F C- F+ C- F D-
1.18 61% 57% 29% +4 -1 1.08 29% 1.1 .32 10% .50 66% .33 1.03 45% 36% 28% -9 -1 0.83 26% 1.2 .31 13% .28 82% .23
Shot Accuracy Shot Selection PPS 2nd Chance TOs Freethrows Shot Accuracy Shot Selection PPS 2nd Chance TOs Freethrows
Jan
31		 North Texas B A A D+ A 43% 23% 34% C+ A D A+ C+ A D F F+ C+ D+ C A+ B- 50% 23% 27% C+ B- A+ A+ A+ F D+ D D
1.08 70% 45% 31% +5 0 1.13 27% 1.3 .33 18% .33 61% .20 1.02 62% 33% 14% -7 +1 0.88 25% 0.7 .17 9% .38 74% .28
Feb
5		 Memphis D+ A+ F F F+ 26% 15% 58% C+ D- C+ A- B A- A+ F A D F D+ F F 28% 39% 33% A+ F A C+ A B- D+ D D
1.00 79% 13% 23% -8 0 0.85 35% 1.1 .37 16% .52 60% .31 1.13 75% 41% 42% +10 -3 1.16 28% 1.1 .31 20% .33 76% .25
Feb
8		 Rice D C+ F F+ F+ 37% 25% 38% B- D- C+ C- C+ A+ B- F D+ B C- C A B+ 22% 30% 48% B- B D+ A B C- A+ A+ A+
1.07 63% 23% 30% -4 -1 0.92 34% 1.0 .34 11% .35 62% .22 0.98 58% 38% 27% -5 -2 0.87 37% 0.8 .28 17% .18 50% .09
Feb
11		 Tulsa C- F F B+ F 50% 20% 30% B F+ C+ D+ C A+ D- D D- A+ D B- A+ A 43% 12% 45% C+ A- B+ A+ A+ A+ A+ A+ A+
1.02 44% 18% 38% -9 +1 0.85 27% 1.1 .30 9% .21 69% .15 0.94 64% 33% 26% -4 +1 0.98 27% 0.9 .24 21% .17 67% .11
Feb
15		 Tulane F D- F F F 46% 19% 35% B- F B- F F A C- F D- A+ A A- C B+ 39% 14% 47% D B B A+ A+ B- A+ F A+
0.86 50% 22% 24% -12 +1 0.79 37% 0.4 .15 13% .31 59% .18 0.88 45% 29% 33% -7 +1 0.90 19% 0.6 .11 16% .09 100% .09
Feb
18		 Temple B A- B B+ A- 43% 31% 25% D B+ F F F A+ C+ A- B B- D C+ A+ A- 50% 30% 20% C B+ D- B- C- F B A+ A
1.15 68% 44% 38% +8 -1 1.16 17% 0.4 .07 9% .32 79% .25 1.08 63% 38% 9% -5 0 0.91 33% 0.9 .31 8% .31 63% .20
Feb
22		 Memphis B- C A C B 42% 25% 34% C+ B C F F B+ A C- A- A B F A+ C 41% 27% 31% C C A C+ A B B+ A A
1.09 59% 46% 33% +2 0 1.06 32% 0.5 .18 17% .42 72% .30 0.93 52% 57% 25% -1 -1 0.98 28% 1.1 .31 21% .25 64% .16
Mar
1		 North Texas D- C- F+ F+ D 44% 16% 40% B+ D+ F+ F F A- C+ D- C- B- A A+ B A 58% 15% 27% F+ A- A+ F F+ F+ A+ A+ A+
0.90 55% 29% 28% -7 +1 0.91 24% 0.5 .12 19% .38 65% .25 0.97 47% 13% 29% -13 +2 0.81 25% 1.7 .42 12% .18 60% .11
Mar
4		 Charlotte A- B F F D- 51% 22% 27% B- D A+ A- A+ A B A+ A+ C F F C+ F 35% 15% 50% C+ F+ A A+ A+ F B- C+ B-
1.25 65% 18% 21% -6 +1 0.92 46% 1.3 .57 9% .35 100% .35 1.16 76% 71% 33% +11 +1 1.25 26% 0.3 .06 13% .30 71% .22
Mar
8		 East Carolina B- A B- B- A- 53% 29% 19% C+ A- F F F A+ B+ C- B+ D A+ C- C- B 40% 25% 35% C- B- F+ D- F D+ B- F+ C
1.18 71% 41% 36% +8 0 1.19 21% 0.9 .18 10% .32 73% .23 1.09 38% 40% 33% -8 0 0.85 40% 1.2 .47 16% .33 76% .25
Mar
13		 Charlotte C+ A+ F F C 48% 20% 32% B C+ D+ C C- A+ D+ F F+ F+ F A F F 31% 14% 55% B- F B C+ B- F B- A+ A
1.17 74% 27% 22% 0 +1 1.04 28% 1.1 .31 9% .28 59% .17 1.25 75% 29% 46% +14 0 1.31 30% 0.9 .27 14% .30 53% .16



Numbers in tables represent percent chance of outcome occurring.



Projected American Athletic Finish

0-18 1-17 2-16 3-15 4-14 5-13 6-12 7-11 8-10 9-9 10-8 11-7 12-6 13-5 14-4 15-3 16-2 17-1 18-0 Total
1st 1st
2nd 2nd
3rd 3rd
4th 100.0 100.0 4th
5th 5th
6th 6th
7th 7th
8th 8th
9th 9th
10th 10th
11th 11th
12th 12th
13th 13th
Total 100.0 Total



American Athletic Regular Season Championship

Record Champion Total Outright 2-Way 3-Way 4-Way 5-Way 6-Way 7-Way 8-Way
18-0
17-1
16-2
15-3
14-4
13-5
12-6
11-7 0.0%
10-8
9-9
Total



NCAA Tournament Selection

Conf RecordRecord ChanceTourney
Bid		AutoAt-LargeAvg
Seed		 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 No Bid At-Large if not Auto
18-0
17-1
16-2
15-3
14-4
13-5
12-6
11-7 100.0% 100.0
10-8
9-9
8-10
7-11
6-12
5-13
4-14
3-15
2-16
1-17
0-18
Total 100% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0 100.0 0.0%