Bowling Green
Mid-American
2019-20 - 2025-26 - 2026-27
Switch to All-time Team Page
All team stats adjusted for opponents. See methodology page for details.

Predictive Rating -0.3 166
Results Rating -1.8 195
Consistency 0.19 342
Pace 70.1 129
Improvement -6.2 355

Overall 1st FGA Second Chance TOs Free
throws
Shot Selection
Offense C- 224 C D- C C+ B
Defense C+ 127 C C+ C+ C- C-

Offense Breakdown
Attempts Conversion Rate Total Effect
Close Shots 49% 4 C- 56% 233 +5.0 27
2 Pt. Jumpers 40% 149 D 34% 302 -2.0 277
Three Pointers 34% 324 C+ 35% 121 -3.0 279
Shot Selection/Accuracy B +1.2 40 C- -1.1 216
1st FG Attempt C 1.02 169
Second Chance D+ 27.7% 254 F 0.84 361 D- 0.23 340
Opponents' Steals C+ 8.9% 133
Other Turnovers C- 7.5% 229
Turnovers C 16.4% 162
Freethrows C+ 0.31 157 C 73% 175 C+ 0.23 147
Total Offense C- -2.0 224

Assists Opponents' Blocks
Close Shots D- 37% 328 D+ 12.8% 297
2 Pt. Jumpers Shots B- 33% 77 D- 7.9% 328
Three Pointers C+ 86% 147 C- 1.1% 245
Total D 49% 306 F 8.0% 350


Defense Breakdown
Attempts Conversion Rate Total Effect
Close Shots 38% 205 C 57% 161 -0.6 150
2 Pt. Jumpers 18% 275 C- 39% 215 -1.0 110
Three Pointers 44% 71 C+ 33% 125 +1.1 248
Shot Selection/Accuracy C- +0.4 232 C+ -0.8 145
1st FG Attempt C 1.01 159
Second Chance B- 27.7% 84 C 1.04 190 C+ 0.29 108
Turnovers from Steals B- 11.0% 63
Other Turnovers D+ 6.6% 267
Turnovers C+ 17.6% 116
Freethrows C- 0.32 253 C 73% 207 C- 0.24 250
Total Defense C+ +1.7 127

Assists Blocks
Close Shots B- 45% 101 C+ 12.4% 111
2 Pt. Jumpers Shots B 17% 36 C+ 5.4% 130
Three Pointers C- 85% 237 D 0.3% 308
Total C+ 54% 151 C 5.8% 156

Miscellaneous
Offense Defense
Possession Length 17.5 187 16.8 87
Fast Break Points Per Possession 0.24 34 0.18 233
Consistency 0.14 282 0.15 349
Improvement -3.4 323 -2.8 307

NCAA Tournament Selection
At-Large Selection Status Out of Consideration
Projected Seeding Not in Tournament  

Prediction Ranges
Pessimistic
5th Percentile
Expected
50th Percentile
Optimistic
95th Percentile
Predictive Rating Rank 175 167 145
Results Rating Rank 210 206 153
Conference Record 9 - 9 9 - 9 9 - 9
Conference Finish 5 5 5
NCAA Tourney Seed None None None
NCAA Tourney Finish None None None

NowWin NextLose Next
#1 Overall Seed 0% 0% 0%
#1 Seed 0% 0% 0%
Top 2 Seed 0% 0% 0%
Top 4 Seed 0% 0% 0%
Top 6 Seed 0% 0% 0%
NCAA Tourney Bid 4% 9% 0%
At-Large Bid if not Auto Qualifier 0% 0% 0%
Average Seed 13.8 13.8 n/a
.500 or above 100% 100% 100%
.500 or above in Conference 100% 100% 100.0%
Conference Champion 0% 0% 0.0%
Last Place in Conference 0% 0% 0.0%
First Four0% 0% 0%
First Round4% 9% 0%
Second Round0% 0% 0%
Sweet Sixteen0% 0% 0%
Elite Eight0% 0% 0%
Final Four0% 0% 0%
Championship Game0% 0% 0%
National Champion0% 0% 0%

Projected Record by Quadrant
QuadProjectedProjected Cumulative
Quad 1a0 - 00 - 0
Quad 1b0 - 10 - 1
Quad 21 - 31 - 4
Quad 34 - 65 - 11
Quad 411 - 316 - 14


Date Opponent Result/Prediction Lead Record Total Rating Offense Defense
Avg Time Overall Conf Total First
FGA
2nd Chance TOs Total First
FGA
2nd Chance TOs
 Mon, Nov 3 233 Texas St. W 83 - 48 75% +13  88% 1 - 0 A+ +28 B- +5 A+ F B- A+ +23 A A+ A+
 Sun, Nov 9 302 Le Moyne W 83 - 60 85% +6  70% 2 - 0 B +11 C+ +2 B- F A+ A +9 B C A+
 Sat, Nov 15 109 @Davidson L 87 - 91 25% -9  1% 2 - 1 C+ +3 B +7 D+ B- A+ D+ -3 F B A+
 Wed, Nov 19 152 William & Mary L 74 - 82 59% -9  10% 2 - 2 D -11 F -11 F C F C+ +2 D+ C A+
 Mon, Nov 24 330 Bucknell W 71 - 66 85% +7  91% 3 - 2 D+ -6 D- -7 D+ D F C+ +1 F B A+
 Wed, Nov 26 359 VMI W 81 - 48 93% +22  99% 4 - 2 A- +16 C- -0 B C F A+ +18 A+ A A
 Mon, Dec 1 98 @Kansas St. W 82 - 66 20% +9  98% 5 - 2 A+ +25 A+ +19 A- A A+ A- +7 A+ D+ F
 Sat, Dec 6 99 Utah Valley L 71 - 82 40% -10  6% 5 - 3 D -9 D -5 D C+ B D+ -4 F A- A-
 Tue, Dec 16 347 Chicago St. W 76 - 55 92% +11  99% 6 - 3 C+ +5 D -5 C- F A A +10 A+ B C+
 Sat, Dec 20 220 @Ohio W 68 - 58 51% +9  87% 7 - 3 1 - 0 B +10 D- -6 D D+ F A+ +16 A C A+
 Tue, Dec 30 93 Miami (OH) L 83 - 93 38% -13  12% 7 - 4 1 - 1 D+ -7 C +1 B- D+ C D- -7 F F A+
 Sat, Jan 3 199 @Massachusetts W 101 - 100 OT 45% +0  50% 8 - 4 2 - 1 C+ +2 B- +5 B+ F A D+ -4 F B- B
 Tue, Jan 6 160 @Kent St. L 93 - 96 36% -2  22% 8 - 5 2 - 2 C +0 A+ +17 B+ A+ A- F -17 F F F
 Fri, Jan 9 69 Akron L 67 - 77 28% -11  0% 8 - 6 2 - 3 C- -4 F+ -10 C F D B+ +6 A C B+
 Sat, Jan 17 249 Eastern Michigan W 85 - 79 77% +6  77% 9 - 6 3 - 3 C- -2 A +13 A+ C+ C+ F -15 F C F+
 Tue, Jan 20 276 @Western Michigan W 72 - 54 63% +10  87% 10 - 6 4 - 3 B+ +14 D+ -3 D+ F C+ A+ +19 A+ B+ A+
 Sat, Jan 24 142 @Toledo L 72 - 73 34% +1  57% 10 - 7 4 - 4 C+ +3 C- -2 A- F F B +5 A+ D D-
 Tue, Jan 27 218 Buffalo L 78 - 89 72% -5  5% 10 - 8 4 - 5 F+ -17 C -0 D A- B+ F -18 F B- D-
 Sat, Jan 31 270 @Central Michigan L 59 - 62 61% +4  66% 10 - 9 4 - 6 D+ -6 F -19 F F C+ A+ +13 A+ F C
 Tue, Feb 3 280 Ball St. W 77 - 52 82% +13  94% 11 - 9 5 - 6 A- +15 B+ +9 A+ F+ F A +9 A C- C-
 Sat, Feb 7 144 @Arkansas St. L 54 - 91 35% -21  0% 11 - 10 F -33 F -24 F F F D- -7 F D D
 Wed, Feb 11 343 @Northern Illinois W 68 - 52 81% +15  94% 12 - 10 6 - 6 B- +6 F+ -9 C F F A+ +16 A+ B D-
 Sat, Feb 14 142 Toledo W 80 - 70 57% +6  71% 13 - 10 7 - 6 B- +8 B +6 C C+ A+ B- +2 A D- D+
 Tue, Feb 17 160 Kent St. L 71 - 78 59% -3  28% 13 - 11 7 - 7 D -10 F+ -10 F F+ D C+ +0 D+ A+ F
 Fri, Feb 20 93 @Miami (OH) L 77 - 91 19% -10  6% 13 - 12 7 - 8 D+ -5 C +0 C D- C+ D+ -4 D D C
 Tue, Feb 24 276 Western Michigan L 79 - 88 81% -2  29% 13 - 13 7 - 9 F -19 D -6 D+ F A- F -12 D- C- F
 Sat, Feb 28 199 Massachusetts W 81 - 62 68% -0  36% 14 - 13 8 - 9 B+ +14 B+ +8 B+ F+ B+ A- +8 B- A+ D-
 Fri, Mar 6 249 @Eastern Michigan W 77 - 69 57% +3  68% 15 - 13 9 - 9 B- +6 C+ +2 F+ B A B- +3 C A- D-
 Thu, Mar 12 142 Toledo L 76 - 77 46%
Totals 15 - 14 9 - 9 +0 C- -2 D C- B C+ +2 C+ C C+



Game Detail
Grades are adjusted for opponent strength in each category. Game stats are not adjusted for oppoent strength. See methodology page for descriptions of rating types.
Offense Defense
Tot Off First Field Goal Attempt Second Chance TOs Freethrows Tot Def First Field Goal Attempt Second Chance TOs Freethrows
Shot Accuracy Shot Selection Points Per Shot Shot Accuracy Shot Selection Points Per Shot
2 C 2 L 3 Tot 2 C 2 L 3 Tot Off Reb PPP Tot Att Perc Tot 2 C 2 L 3 Tot 2 C 2 L 3 Tot Off Reb PPP Tot Att Perc Tot
Season Ratings C- C- D C+ C- 49% 40% 34% B C D+ F D- C C+ C C+ C+ C C- C+ C+ 38% 18% 44% C- C B- C C+ C+ C- C C-
1.06 56% 34% 35% -1 +1 1.02 28% 0.8 .23 16% .31 73% .23 1.06 57% 39% 33% -1 0 1.01 28% 1.0 .29 18% .32 73% .23
Nov
3
Texas St. B- A F A+ A+ 47% 14% 39% B- A+ D F F B- F+ D F+ A+ B+ C A+ A+ 47% 20% 33% F A A+ D A+ A+ A+ A+ A+
1.18 71% 29% 50% +14 +2 1.33 25% 0.6 .14 17% .27 69% .19 0.68 50% 40% 18% -12 +1 0.80 14% 1.0 .14 26% .13 43% .06
Nov
9
Le Moyne C+ F A+ A+ C+ 57% 10% 33% A B- D+ F F A+ D- A+ C+ A A- F A- B+ 35% 11% 54% D+ B F A+ C A+ A- F C
1.18 42% 67% 47% +1 +3 1.09 27% 0.4 .11 9% .26 94% .25 0.85 50% 60% 28% -5 +1 0.93 34% 0.7 .25 34% .26 92% .24
Nov
15
Davidson B C D+ F D+ 49% 30% 21% C D+ C+ B B- A+ A+ C+ A+ D+ D+ F F F 30% 21% 49% B- F A D- B A+ F F F
1.10 57% 35% 25% -4 0 0.93 31% 1.1 .33 11% .50 69% .34 1.15 62% 56% 48% +15 -1 1.30 23% 1.2 .27 23% .62 74% .46
Nov
19
William & Mary F D- A+ F F 54% 8% 38% A F D+ B C F A+ A- A+ C+ D B- C+ C- 43% 6% 51% D D+ C+ C C A+ D F F
0.95 52% 75% 16% -11 +3 0.86 27% 1.1 .30 23% .45 78% .35 1.05 67% 33% 32% +2 +2 1.10 25% 1.1 .28 23% .40 88% .35
Nov
24
Bucknell D- F C A+ D- 42% 11% 47% A D+ F A+ D F A+ D- A+ C+ D- A+ F F 44% 12% 44% F+ F A+ F B A+ F C F
1.03 42% 40% 43% 0 +2 1.04 16% 1.8 .28 22% .48 69% .33 0.96 63% 0% 42% +3 +2 1.12 15% 1.5 .23 26% .39 75% .29
Nov
26
VMI C- B+ A- A- B- 42% 17% 42% B- B A+ F C F C C C A+ A+ A+ A+ A+ 40% 5% 56% F A+ D- A+ A A F F F
1.22 70% 50% 40% +11 +1 1.25 56% 0.8 .42 24% .30 73% .22 0.72 35% 0% 8% -32 +2 0.42 30% 0.5 .14 21% .61 78% .47
Dec
1
Kansas St. A+ F A+ A+ A- 40% 10% 50% A- A- A+ C- A A+ B+ B B+ A- A- A+ A+ A+ 49% 14% 37% D- A+ D+ C D+ F F A+ C-
1.28 37% 60% 46% +3 +1 1.10 44% 1.1 .50 12% .34 74% .25 1.03 52% 14% 26% -11 +2 0.84 35% 1.1 .38 9% .38 55% .21
Dec
6
Utah Valley D A+ F+ F D 43% 19% 39% C+ D C B- C+ B C F D+ D+ F F D F 52% 8% 40% D F C+ A A- A- B- C+ B-
0.99 74% 30% 14% -6 +1 0.91 30% 1.1 .33 18% .34 65% .22 1.14 76% 75% 37% +14 +3 1.35 35% 0.9 .31 24% .27 67% .18
Dec
16
Chicago St. D B- F F D 58% 2% 40% A+ C- F D- F A D+ D D A A+ A+ A- A+ 30% 48% 22% A+ A+ D+ A+ B C+ F A+ F
1.13 67% 0% 29% +1 +4 1.12 23% 1.0 .23 15% .31 72% .23 0.82 33% 25% 27% -16 -4 0.62 30% 0.7 .22 16% .48 63% .30
Dec
20
Ohio D- F B C+ D- 53% 16% 31% B+ D C+ D- D+ F A+ A+ A+ A+ F F A+ A+ 26% 13% 62% D+ A B- D- C A+ F A F
1.01 46% 43% 36% -5 +2 0.96 35% 0.9 .32 24% .45 83% .37 0.86 70% 60% 17% -10 0 0.82 25% 1.1 .28 22% .57 63% .36
Dec
30
Miami (OH) C A- A+ F B- 47% 18% 35% B+ B- C- D- D+ C A D- B+ D- D+ F F F 44% 17% 40% D+ F F D F A+ F+ F F
1.10 69% 50% 26% +3 +1 1.11 28% 0.8 .22 17% .37 70% .26 1.23 67% 50% 47% +14 +1 1.31 31% 1.3 .38 21% .40 92% .37
Jan
3
Massachusetts B- B- F A+ B 54% 18% 29% B B+ F A- F A A+ F+ A+ D+ D B F F 54% 12% 35% F F A+ F B- B F D- F
1.16 63% 30% 44% +6 +1 1.16 14% 1.2 .17 11% .58 67% .39 1.15 64% 33% 50% +11 +2 1.29 20% 1.7 .33 21% .51 71% .36
Jan
6
Kent St. A+ C- F A+ B 53% 9% 38% A B+ A+ A- A+ A- A+ A+ A+ F F D F F 42% 13% 45% D- F C F F F B+ F C
1.32 56% 25% 44% +4 +3 1.15 44% 1.2 .52 13% .51 87% .44 1.36 68% 43% 42% +10 +1 1.25 34% 1.5 .52 14% .31 89% .28
Jan
9
Akron F+ D+ B C+ C 43% 24% 33% C- C D+ F F D D+ F D B+ D+ A+ B A 31% 13% 56% C+ A C C C B+ D- C- D-
0.93 55% 42% 35% 0 0 1.02 28% 0.5 .15 21% .25 64% .16 1.07 65% 14% 32% -2 0 0.98 32% 1.3 .41 19% .31 78% .24
Jan
17
Eastern Michigan A C- D A+ A+ 51% 24% 24% C+ A+ B- C- C+ C+ B+ B A- F D F D F 38% 24% 38% D+ F F+ A C F+ C+ F D+
1.28 56% 33% 67% +10 0 1.22 32% 1.0 .32 15% .37 76% .28 1.19 63% 58% 37% +8 0 1.18 32% 0.8 .26 14% .24 86% .21
Jan
20
Western Michigan D+ D A+ F F+ 58% 6% 36% A+ D+ D+ F F C+ A+ C A+ A+ A+ F A+ A+ 34% 15% 51% D- A+ B- A B+ A+ B D B-
1.08 55% 67% 28% -3 +3 1.02 26% 0.4 .11 12% .46 70% .32 0.81 31% 57% 25% -13 0 0.77 28% 0.8 .23 23% .25 77% .19
Jan
24
Toledo C- C A+ A+ B+ 67% 8% 25% A+ A- C+ F F F C D C- B A+ B C A+ 39% 22% 39% C- A+ C+ F D D- A- F B-
1.06 59% 75% 46% +8 +4 1.25 36% 0.2 .07 24% .23 67% .15 1.08 39% 38% 35% -7 0 0.88 28% 1.3 .36 12% .20 92% .18
Jan
27
Buffalo C C F C D- 55% 12% 33% A- D C- A+ A- B+ C- F D- F B F F F 40% 10% 50% D F B D+ B- D- D- D F+
1.17 61% 17% 35% 0 +2 1.06 31% 1.4 .43 15% .26 60% .16 1.33 53% 60% 54% +15 +1 1.35 22% 1.2 .26 13% .38 77% .29
Jan
31
Central Michigan F F F F F 59% 15% 25% B+ F F F F C+ F F F A+ C A+ A+ A+ 46% 28% 26% D+ A+ C- F F C C+ A+ A
0.84 49% 22% 27% -11 +2 0.85 25% 0.4 .09 16% .20 58% .12 0.88 57% 21% 15% -13 0 0.76 29% 1.5 .44 18% .26 47% .12
Feb
3
Ball St. B+ A+ F A+ A+ 42% 21% 37% C+ A+ C- F F+ F B- A+ A A C- C- A+ A 34% 23% 43% B A A+ F C- C- D A+ B+
1.23 78% 22% 56% +17 0 1.37 32% 0.7 .23 22% .31 93% .29 0.83 56% 36% 15% -13 -1 0.74 16% 1.5 .24 16% .32 47% .15
Shot Accuracy Shot Selection PPS 2nd Chance TOs Freethrows Shot Accuracy Shot Selection PPS 2nd Chance TOs Freethrows
Feb
7
Arkansas St. F C F F F 40% 22% 38% C F D F F F B+ C+ B+ D- F A F F 37% 8% 56% D- F D D+ D D C- A+ B+
0.72 59% 25% 10% -16 0 0.69 23% 0.1 .03 23% .38 73% .27 1.21 74% 25% 41% +11 +2 1.27 41% 1.1 .44 17% .34 57% .19
Feb
11
Northern Illinois F+ C B C- C- 56% 14% 30% B+ C F D F F F A+ F A+ B+ D- A+ A+ 37% 14% 49% C+ A+ A+ F B D- A- F B-
0.98 61% 43% 33% +2 +2 1.10 17% 1.0 .17 22% .20 82% .16 0.75 47% 43% 16% -17 +1 0.71 17% 1.0 .17 19% .26 73% .19
Feb
14
Toledo B F F A+ C- 50% 14% 36% B C F+ A+ C+ A+ A D+ A- B- A+ F D A- 27% 33% 40% A A D- C- D- D+ B C- B-
1.22 48% 29% 50% +2 +2 1.10 26% 1.4 .37 11% .32 68% .22 1.07 14% 59% 38% -3 -2 0.92 34% 1.1 .37 14% .23 77% .18
Feb
17
Kent St. F+ F+ D+ F F 59% 6% 35% A+ F D- F F+ D A+ D+ A+ C+ A- D F D 29% 16% 56% C+ D+ A+ A+ A+ F F B F
0.98 48% 33% 24% -12 +3 0.86 25% 0.8 .20 18% .60 69% .42 1.08 46% 43% 40% +2 0 1.07 26% 0.3 .08 14% .64 70% .45
Feb
20
Miami (OH) C D- F A D+ 43% 14% 43% B+ C D F+ D- C+ D C- D D+ B- F F D- 33% 13% 54% C- D C F D C F A D
1.04 52% 25% 40% -1 +1 1.03 24% 0.8 .19 16% .24 73% .18 1.23 59% 57% 43% +10 +1 1.23 24% 1.4 .32 15% .43 67% .29
Feb
24
Western Michigan D C F A- D 45% 18% 36% C D+ D- F F A- A+ D- A+ F D D D- F 38% 37% 25% A D- A+ F C- F F F F
1.08 60% 10% 40% -1 +1 1.02 23% 0.7 .15 10% .49 66% .32 1.21 60% 42% 38% +4 -2 1.06 19% 1.7 .31 12% .48 87% .42
Feb
28
Massachusetts B+ C- A+ A- B 45% 8% 47% A- B+ C F F+ B+ C- A+ B A- C- A+ B- B 45% 18% 37% D- B- A+ A+ A+ D- A B+ A
1.24 59% 50% 39% +5 +2 1.16 29% 0.7 .19 14% .37 86% .32 0.95 61% 22% 32% -3 +1 0.98 20% 0.9 .17 15% .23 62% .14
Mar
6
Eastern Michigan C+ A F C D 32% 40% 28% F F+ B- B B A A+ D A- B- F C+ A+ C- 33% 39% 27% A C B- A+ A- D- D- C D-
1.08 71% 14% 33% -6 -3 0.85 33% 1.1 .38 11% .41 69% .28 0.97 76% 35% 21% 0 -3 0.96 24% 0.8 .18 14% .31 74% .23




Numbers in tables represent percent chance of outcome occurring.




Projected Mid-American Finish

0-18 1-17 2-16 3-15 4-14 5-13 6-12 7-11 8-10 9-9 10-8 11-7 12-6 13-5 14-4 15-3 16-2 17-1 18-0 Total
1st 1st
2nd 2nd
3rd 3rd
4th 4th
5th 100.0 100.0 5th
6th 6th
7th 7th
8th 8th
9th 9th
10th 10th
11th 11th
12th 12th
13th 13th
Total 100.0 Total



Mid-American Regular Season Championship

Record Champion Total Outright 2-Way 3-Way 4-Way 5-Way 6-Way 7-Way 8-Way
18-0
17-1
16-2
15-3
14-4
13-5
12-6
11-7
10-8
9-9 0.0%
Total



NCAA Tournament Selection

Conf RecordRecord ChanceTourney
Bid
AutoAt-LargeAvg
Seed
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 No Bid At-Large if not Auto
18-0
17-1
16-2
15-3
14-4
13-5
12-6
11-7
10-8
9-9 100.0% 4.0% 4.0% 13.8 0.1 1.1 2.4 0.4 96.1
8-10
7-11
6-12
5-13
4-14
3-15
2-16
1-17
0-18
Total 100% 4.0% 4.0% 0.0% 13.8 96.1 0.0%


Best / Worst Case Scenarios

ChanceTourney
Bid
Avg
Seed
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
Win Out 4.0% 100.0% 13.8 2.8 27.3 60.3 9.6
Win Out, Lose in Conf. Tourney Championship 10.9%
Win Out, Lose in Conf. Tourney Semi-Final 30.2%
Lose Out 55.0%