Kent St.
Mid-American
2019-20 - 2025-26 - 2026-27
Switch to All-time Team Page
All team stats adjusted for opponents. See methodology page for descriptions of rating types.

Predictive Rating +0.4 152
Results Rating +4.1 104
Consistency 0.09 3
Pace 74.8 33
Improvement -2.9 293

Overall 1st FGA Second Chance TOs Free
throws		 Shot Selection
Offense C+ 132 C- B- D A C+
Defense C- 197 C C C- D+ C-

Offense Breakdown
Attempts Conversion Rate Total Effect
Close Shots 37% 231 C- 55% 253 -2.1 255
2 Pt. Jumpers 33% 233 D+ 35% 266 -1.7 267
Three Pointers 46% 81 C 34% 189 +2.4 99
Shot Selection/Accuracy C+ +0.3 159 C- -1.7 233
1st FG Attempt C- 0.99 215
Second Chance B 34.5% 62 C+ 1.06 133 B- 0.37 71
Opponents' Steals D+ 10.6% 286
Other Turnovers D+ 8.1% 283
Turnovers D 18.7% 300
Freethrows A 0.38 8 B- 75% 114 A 0.28 8
Total Offense C+ +1.3 132

Assists Blocks (Opponents')
Close Shots B- 55% 68 D+ 13.0% 302
2 Pt. Jumpers Shots D+ 19% 273 B- 3.7% 83
Three Pointers C 83% 206 C 0.9% 187
Total B- 60% 81 C 5.8% 214

Defense Breakdown
Attempts Conversion Rate Total Effect
Close Shots 39% 184 C 57% 162 -0.2 173
2 Pt. Jumpers 18% 271 B- 35% 79 -1.6 62
Three Pointers 44% 95 C- 35% 229 +2.1 283
Shot Selection/Accuracy C- +0.4 237 C -0.1 177
1st FG Attempt C 1.03 186
Second Chance C 30.5% 185 C+ 1.01 142 C 0.31 172
Turnovers from Steals C- 8.6% 246
Other Turnovers C 7.3% 173
Turnovers C- 15.9% 235
Freethrows D+ 0.33 272 C 72% 169 D+ 0.24 262
Total Defense C- -0.9 197

Assists Blocks
Close Shots C+ 47% 154 C- 9.4% 236
2 Pt. Jumpers Shots B 17% 40 C 4.5% 192
Three Pointers D 89% 331 C+ 1.1% 119
Total C- 58% 228 C- 4.9% 231

Miscellaneous
Offense Defense
Possession Length 16.4 83 16.7 75
Fast Break Points Per Possession 0.16 201 0.21 298
Consistency 0.14 273 0.15 340
Improvement -3.0 323 +0.1 181

NCAA Tournament Selection
At-Large Selection Status Out of Consideration
Projected Seeding Not in Tournament  

Prediction Ranges
Pessimistic
5th Percentile 		Expected
50th Percentile 		Optimistic
95th Percentile
Predictive Rating Rank 175 150 129
Results Rating Rank 134 113 96
Conference Record 13 - 5 14 - 4 15 - 3
Conference Finish 3 3 3
NCAA Tourney Seed None None 14
NCAA Tourney Finish None None 1st Round

NowWin NextLose Next
#1 Overall Seed 0% 0% 0%
#1 Seed 0% 0% 0%
Top 2 Seed 0% 0% 0%
Top 4 Seed 0% 0% 0%
Top 6 Seed 0% 0% 0%
NCAA Tourney Bid 6% 8% 5%
At-Large Bid if not Auto Qualifier 0% 0% 0%
Average Seed 13.2 12.9 13.4
.500 or above 100% 100% 100%
.500 or above in Conference 100% 100% 100%
Conference Champion 0% 0% 0%
Last Place in Conference 0% 0% 0%
First Four0% 0% 0%
First Round6% 8% 5%
Second Round0% 0% 0%
Sweet Sixteen0% 0% 0%
Elite Eight0% 0% 0%
Final Four0% 0% 0%
Championship Game0% 0% 0%
National Champion0% 0% 0%
Next Game: Akron (Home) - 34.7% chance of victory

Projected Record by Quadrant
QuadProjectedProjected Cumulative
Quad 1a0 - 10 - 1
Quad 1b0 - 10 - 2
Quad 21 - 21 - 4
Quad 39 - 310 - 7
Quad 412 - 222 - 9


Date Opponent Result/Prediction Lead Record Total Rating Offense Defense
Avg Time Overall Conf Total First
FGA		 2nd Chance TOs Total First
FGA		 2nd Chance TOs
 Mon, Nov 3 150 Troy L 97 - 103 OT 61% -8  9% 0 - 1 D -8 C+ +2 D- A C+ F+ -10 F C- D
 Fri, Nov 7 168 Cornell W 110 - 102 66% +8  98% 1 - 1 C+ +4 A +14 A+ A C+ F -10 F D- A-
 Mon, Nov 10 107 UNC Wilmington W 86 - 77 48% +8  95% 2 - 1 B +10 B+ +9 A+ B D+ C+ +1 A+ D F
 Sat, Nov 15 316 Cleveland St. W 102 - 95 83% +2  72% 3 - 1 C- -3 B+ +8 D A C+ F -12 F+ F B-
 Sun, Nov 16 161 Wright St. W 76 - 72 OT 53% -2  19% 4 - 1 C+ +4 D -4 F A F A- +8 B- C+ D+
 Tue, Nov 18 286 Eastern Kentucky W 93 - 78 84% +16  98% 5 - 1 C+ +5 D+ -4 D+ B- F B+ +7 B C A+
 Sat, Nov 22 316 Cleveland St. W 91 - 71 89% +14  96% 6 - 1 B- +7 D -5 B- D+ F A +11 B+ B- A
 Wed, Dec 3 166 Austin Peay W 96 - 84 64% +3  82% 7 - 1 B +9 A+ +15 A+ A C D- -7 F A+ D+
 Sun, Dec 14 224 @Portland L 78 - 88 54% -0  40% 7 - 2 D -11 D- -8 F+ B F C -1 F+ A- C-
 Sat, Dec 20 188 @Massachusetts W 69 - 59 47% +5  84% 8 - 2 1 - 0 B +11 D- -7 D- C D+ A+ +18 A+ A+ C+
 Mon, Dec 29 7 @Purdue L 60 - 101 2% -24  0% 8 - 3 F+ -17 F -11 F+ F+ D C- -2 D- A+ D+
 Sat, Jan 3 321 Northern Illinois W 77 - 73 89% +9  99% 9 - 3 2 - 0 D -9 D -6 F+ D+ D D+ -4 F D+ A+
 Tue, Jan 6 179 Bowling Green W 96 - 93 67% +2  60% 10 - 3 3 - 0 C -1 A+ +20 A+ A+ A- F -21 F+ F F+
 Sat, Jan 10 264 @Central Michigan L 85 - 87 62% -1  27% 10 - 4 3 - 1 C- -5 B- +5 F A+ F+ F+ -9 B F F
 Tue, Jan 13 208 @Buffalo W 87 - 81 50% +7  91% 11 - 4 4 - 1 B- +6 B+ +9 B- A- C+ C- -2 C+ B- F
 Fri, Jan 16 162 Toledo W 87 - 84 64% -0  42% 12 - 4 5 - 1 C -0 B- +5 C+ C+ A+ D -5 C+ F C
 Tue, Jan 20 86 Miami (OH) L 101 - 107 OT 37% -6  16% 12 - 5 5 - 2 C- -2 A- +10 B- A+ D F -11 F A F
 Sat, Jan 24 246 @Eastern Michigan W 76 - 75 2OT 59% +3  76% 13 - 5 6 - 2 C -1 D -5 C+ F F B +5 A+ C+ F
 Tue, Jan 27 211 Ohio W 72 - 57 72% +4  79% 14 - 5 7 - 2 B +9 F+ -9 F A F A+ +18 A+ B+ D
 Fri, Jan 30 77 @Akron L 52 - 69 17% -11  0% 14 - 6 7 - 3 D+ -6 F -20 F C- F+ A+ +13 B- A+ B+
 Tue, Feb 3 162 @Toledo W 75 - 72 41% -6  6% 15 - 6 8 - 3 B- +6 C +0 F B+ C B+ +6 B- B+ C-
 Sat, Feb 7 238 @Southern Miss L 65 - 66 57% -0  33% 15 - 7 C- -2 D+ -4 F C A- C+ +2 B+ C- D
 Wed, Feb 11 246 Eastern Michigan W 95 - 91 78% -2  35% 16 - 7 9 - 3 C- -4 A+ +18 A- A+ B+ F -22 F D+ C+
 Sat, Feb 14 313 @Ball St. W 75 - 68 74% +6  96% 17 - 7 10 - 3 C +1 D+ -3 C D- D B +4 B- B- D-
 Tue, Feb 17 179 @Bowling Green W 78 - 71 44% +3  61% 18 - 7 11 - 3 B +9 C+ +3 B- F A B+ +6 A C+ B-
 Tue, Feb 24 264 Central Michigan W 83 - 81 81% -9  2% 19 - 7 12 - 3 D+ -7 B +6 B A+ D- F -13 F F B-
 Fri, Feb 27 77 Akron L 84 - 88 35%
 Tue, Mar 3 321 @Northern Illinois W 80 - 72 76%
 Fri, Mar 6 279 Western Michigan W 86 - 76 82%
Totals 21 - 8 14 - 4 +0 C+ +1 A- C- C+ C- -1 C B- A



Game Detail
Grades are adjusted for opponent strength in each category. Game stats are not adjusted for oppoent strength. See methodology page for descriptions of rating types.
Offense Defense
Tot Off First Field Goal Attempt Second Chance TOs Freethrows Tot Def First Field Goal Attempt Second Chance TOs Freethrows
Shot Accuracy Shot Selection Points Per Shot Shot Accuracy Shot Selection Points Per Shot
2 C 2 L 3 Tot 2 C 2 L 3 Tot Off Reb PPP Tot Att Perc Tot 2 C 2 L 3 Tot 2 C 2 L 3 Tot Off Reb PPP Tot Att Perc Tot
Season Ratings C+ C- D+ C C- 37% 33% 46% C+ C- B C+ B- D A B- A C- C B- C- C 39% 18% 44% C- C C C+ C C- D+ C D+
1.11 55% 35% 34% -2 0 0.99 35% 1.1 .37 19% .38 75% .28 1.10 57% 35% 35% 0 0 1.03 31% 1.0 .31 16% .33 72% .27
Nov
3		 Troy C+ F F A+ D- 35% 23% 42% C- D- A+ C A C+ A+ B+ A+ F+ C- C- F F 50% 9% 41% D F A+ F C- D F D+ F
1.13 36% 29% 42% -5 0 0.92 44% 1.0 .46 16% .46 76% .35 1.20 59% 40% 46% +8 +2 1.22 21% 1.7 .34 14% .45 76% .34
Nov
7		 Cornell A A- C A+ A+ 31% 9% 59% C+ A+ B+ A- A C+ A+ D- A+ F D+ F F F 26% 6% 69% B- F F C+ D- A- F+ D F+
1.39 71% 40% 50% +18 +1 1.41 38% 1.3 .48 14% .48 67% .32 1.29 64% 67% 46% +15 +1 1.35 39% 1.1 .42 22% .35 77% .27
Nov
10		 UNC Wilmington B+ A+ F A+ A+ 23% 15% 63% B A+ D+ A+ B D+ A+ D A+ C+ A+ F A+ A+ 51% 15% 34% F A+ D+ D D F A D+ A-
1.19 82% 29% 43% +13 0 1.27 23% 1.4 .33 15% .39 71% .28 1.07 42% 44% 19% -15 +2 0.75 35% 1.2 .42 10% .28 72% .20
Nov
15		 Cleveland St. B+ B D- F F+ 46% 12% 42% B+ D B- A+ A C+ A+ D+ A+ F D- B- F F 22% 12% 66% C F+ F C- F B- F D F
1.34 70% 33% 29% +1 +2 1.08 40% 1.4 .54 14% .71 74% .52 1.25 64% 33% 42% +9 0 1.20 47% 1.1 .50 20% .49 80% .39
Nov
16		 Wright St. D D D+ F F 46% 15% 38% B F A+ C A F A+ A A+ A- F C- A+ B- 37% 28% 35% B+ B- A F C+ D+ C+ A+ B+
1.03 54% 38% 20% -10 +1 0.85 43% 1.1 .45 24% .47 81% .38 0.98 70% 40% 21% -2 -1 0.96 24% 1.3 .32 15% .30 63% .19
Nov
18		 Eastern Kentucky D+ B- F D+ D- 48% 12% 40% A D+ C A- B- F A+ D A+ B+ C+ D A B+ 23% 13% 64% F+ B C- C+ C A+ F A F+
1.14 64% 33% 33% +2 +2 1.10 32% 1.2 .38 20% .56 70% .40 0.96 54% 43% 28% -6 0 0.89 33% 1.1 .35 23% .38 63% .24
Nov
22		 Cleveland St. D D+ F A+ B- 30% 7% 63% B- B- B- F D+ F F+ D+ F+ A A+ F C A 48% 14% 39% F B+ A+ F B- A F B- F
1.16 59% 25% 44% +9 +1 1.23 40% 0.9 .34 24% .25 73% .19 0.91 43% 50% 35% -5 +2 0.95 13% 1.8 .22 23% .50 73% .37
Dec
3		 Austin Peay A+ B+ C+ A+ A+ 40% 10% 50% B A+ F+ A+ A C A+ B- A+ D- B- D+ F F 41% 9% 50% F+ F C- A+ A+ D+ B+ B+ B+
1.31 68% 40% 54% +19 +1 1.44 23% 1.7 .38 18% .53 72% .38 1.14 52% 40% 46% +7 +2 1.20 30% 0.5 .16 15% .26 69% .18
Dec
14		 Portland D- C+ F F F 45% 18% 37% B- F+ B+ C B F A+ A+ A+ C D- F+ C- F 47% 18% 35% D+ F+ A- C+ A- C- C- A C+
0.96 59% 22% 22% -9 +1 0.86 39% 1.1 .42 29% .49 86% .42 1.08 68% 45% 33% +6 +1 1.15 23% 1.1 .26 20% .32 67% .21
Dec
20		 Massachusetts D- F+ A+ F D- 33% 18% 49% C- D- D A C D+ F B F+ A+ B A+ F A+ 40% 32% 28% B+ A+ A+ A+ A+ C+ F D- F
0.98 50% 67% 25% -4 0 0.94 23% 1.3 .29 18% .29 76% .23 0.83 53% 0% 46% -9 -1 0.81 22% 0.8 .17 20% .42 71% .30
Dec
29		 Purdue F A F F D- 18% 36% 46% F+ F+ D- F F+ D B- A+ B+ C- D F D F+ 25% 26% 49% A- D- A+ F A+ D+ C+ F D
0.79 70% 25% 27% -7 -3 0.80 15% 0.8 .13 20% .23 79% .18 1.33 71% 73% 39% +16 -2 1.32 21% 1.5 .32 11% .28 89% .25
Jan
3		 Northern Illinois D B- A+ F F+ 38% 18% 44% D+ F+ B- F D+ D A+ B+ A+ D+ D+ A- F F 29% 17% 55% A- F F B D+ A+ F B+ F
1.05 65% 50% 20% -5 0 0.93 35% 0.8 .30 19% .68 78% .52 1.00 58% 29% 43% +6 0 1.14 40% 0.7 .29 30% .59 60% .35
Jan
6		 Bowling Green A+ A B- A+ A+ 42% 13% 45% B- A+ B+ A+ A+ A- C- A+ B+ F C A+ F D- 53% 9% 38% F+ F+ F F F F+ F F F
1.36 68% 43% 42% +10 +1 1.25 34% 1.5 .52 14% .31 89% .28 1.32 56% 25% 44% +4 +3 1.15 44% 1.2 .52 13% .51 87% .44
Jan
10		 Central Michigan B- D- F D F 38% 15% 47% C F A+ A A+ F+ D- C D F+ C+ C- A B 34% 29% 37% B- B F F F F F+ C F+
1.17 52% 13% 31% -8 +1 0.87 50% 1.4 .68 21% .30 71% .21 1.20 55% 41% 27% -4 -1 0.92 39% 1.4 .52 10% .35 70% .24
Jan
13		 Buffalo B+ B+ F A+ B- 44% 16% 40% C+ B- B- A A- C+ B- B- B C- C A+ F C+ 38% 22% 40% B- C+ A+ F B- F F+ B D
1.24 68% 13% 45% +7 +1 1.18 36% 1.2 .42 17% .31 78% .24 1.15 57% 25% 41% +1 0 1.04 15% 1.7 .26 7% .41 70% .29
Jan
16		 Toledo B- B+ C+ C- C+ 45% 11% 45% B C+ B+ D C+ A+ A+ C A+ D B A+ F B+ 53% 13% 35% F C+ C- F F C F A- F
1.21 67% 40% 33% +4 +2 1.13 41% 0.9 .38 13% .57 72% .41 1.17 52% 29% 42% 0 +2 1.05 29% 1.4 .41 15% .48 69% .33
Jan
20		 Miami (OH) A- B+ B- D+ C+ 43% 13% 45% A- B- A+ B A+ D A+ A- A+ F F F B F 40% 15% 45% D+ F C A+ A F F A+ D-
1.23 67% 43% 32% +3 +1 1.11 44% 1.0 .44 19% .47 81% .38 1.30 84% 67% 32% +13 +1 1.31 24% 0.7 .16 7% .44 65% .29
Jan
24		 Eastern Michigan D C+ D+ B B- 32% 26% 42% D- C+ C F F F A+ A- A+ B F A+ A+ A+ 33% 35% 32% B+ A+ D A C+ F C+ F D
0.97 59% 36% 36% +1 -1 1.02 30% 0.4 .11 23% .47 79% .37 0.96 71% 5% 25% -12 -2 0.75 31% 0.8 .25 12% .25 88% .22
Jan
27		 Ohio F+ F A+ F F 52% 7% 40% A F A+ C+ A F A+ C+ A+ A+ A+ A+ A+ A+ 42% 9% 49% F A+ B A- B+ D B C B
1.00 41% 67% 24% -13 +3 0.81 46% 1.1 .49 28% .68 74% .50 0.79 36% 20% 23% -19 +2 0.68 24% 0.8 .20 14% .27 71% .19
Jan
30		 Akron F F+ F F F 42% 22% 36% C- F A+ F C- F+ A+ F B A+ B+ F B- B- 29% 17% 54% B+ B- A- A+ A+ B+ B+ A+ A-
0.76 48% 27% 0% -25 0 0.52 45% 0.7 .30 22% .39 62% .24 1.01 53% 67% 32% +2 0 1.06 26% 0.8 .21 19% .22 67% .14
Shot Accuracy Shot Selection PPS 2nd Chance TOs Freethrows Shot Accuracy Shot Selection PPS 2nd Chance TOs Freethrows
Feb
3		 Toledo C F F+ C- F 31% 24% 44% F+ F A- C+ B+ C A+ C A+ B+ B- F B+ B 49% 21% 30% F+ B- D A+ B+ C- B- D C
1.10 41% 31% 33% -8 -1 0.85 42% 1.1 .44 18% .37 71% .27 1.06 54% 55% 31% 0 +1 1.04 32% 0.7 .22 15% .26 80% .21
Feb
7		 Southern Miss D+ F A+ F F 34% 16% 50% C F C+ C- C A- D+ F F C+ A+ B- B A- 38% 32% 30% C+ B+ F A- C- D F D- F
1.00 41% 63% 28% -6 0 0.90 30% 1.0 .30 14% .32 44% .14 1.02 44% 33% 29% -9 -1 0.81 38% 0.9 .33 17% .44 79% .35
Feb
11		 Eastern Michigan A+ F A+ A+ A 28% 26% 47% F+ A- B- A+ A+ B+ A+ A+ A+ F F F D F 33% 33% 33% B+ F F A+ D+ C+ A F B+
1.35 38% 58% 45% +8 -1 1.15 33% 1.5 .50 13% .54 88% .47 1.30 95% 47% 37% +17 -2 1.32 41% 0.7 .30 19% .17 80% .14
Feb
14		 Ball St. D+ F+ A+ B C- 40% 12% 48% B+ C D D- D- D A+ F A- B A A+ C B+ 49% 9% 42% F B- A- C- B- D- F D+ F
1.03 50% 50% 38% +1 +1 1.06 29% 0.9 .26 21% .40 70% .28 0.94 42% 0% 32% -13 +2 0.81 20% 0.9 .18 14% .48 73% .35
Feb
17		 Bowling Green C+ F B- A B- 29% 16% 56% C- B- C- F F A A+ D+ A+ B+ A- B- A+ A+ 59% 6% 35% F A B- C+ C+ B- F B- F
1.08 46% 43% 40% +2 0 1.07 26% 0.3 .08 14% .64 70% .45 0.98 48% 33% 24% -12 +3 0.86 25% 0.8 .20 18% .60 69% .42
Feb
24		 Central Michigan B B B- B- B- 39% 11% 50% B- B A B+ A+ D- A+ A A+ F F A F F 26% 28% 47% B F C- F F B- F C+ F
1.24 65% 40% 36% +5 +1 1.14 47% 1.3 .60 19% .52 79% .41 1.21 75% 31% 45% +10 -2 1.19 30% 1.7 .50 19% .41 68% .28



Numbers in tables represent percent chance of outcome occurring.



Projected Mid-American Finish

0-18 1-17 2-16 3-15 4-14 5-13 6-12 7-11 8-10 9-9 10-8 11-7 12-6 13-5 14-4 15-3 16-2 17-1 18-0 Total
1st 0.1 0.1 1st
2nd 0.0 4.5 4.5 2nd
3rd 3.2 22.8 51.7 17.8 95.4 3rd
4th 4th
5th 5th
6th 6th
7th 7th
8th 8th
9th 9th
10th 10th
11th 11th
12th 12th
13th 13th
Total 3.2 22.8 51.7 22.4 Total



Mid-American Regular Season Championship

Record Champion Total Outright 2-Way 3-Way 4-Way 5-Way 6-Way 7-Way 8-Way
18-0
17-1
16-2
15-3 0.3% 0.1    0.1
14-4 0.0%
13-5 0.0%
12-6 0.0%
11-7
10-8
9-9
Total 0.1% 0.1 0.1



NCAA Tournament Selection

Conf RecordRecord ChanceTourney
Bid		AutoAt-LargeAvg
Seed		 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 No Bid At-Large if not Auto
18-0
17-1
16-2
15-3 22.4% 8.2% 8.2% 12.7 0.7 0.9 0.2 20.5
14-4 51.7% 5.9% 5.9% 13.3 0.2 1.7 1.1 0.1 48.6
13-5 22.8% 4.6% 4.6% 13.6 0.0 0.4 0.5 0.1 21.8
12-6 3.2% 2.8% 2.8% 13.7 0.0 0.1 3.1
11-7
10-8
9-9
8-10
7-11
6-12
5-13
4-14
3-15
2-16
1-17
0-18
Total 100% 6.0% 6.0% 0.0% 13.2 94.0 0.0%


Best / Worst Case Scenarios

ChanceTourney
Bid		Avg
Seed		 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
Win Out 1.8% 100.0% 12.7 38.6 51.1 10.3
Win Out, Lose in Conf. Tourney Championship 2.6%
Win Out, Lose in Conf. Tourney Semi-Final 9.1%
Lose Out 1.5%