Illinois
Big Ten
2024-25 - 2025-26 - 2026-27
Switch to All-time Team Page
All team stats adjusted for opponents. See methodology page for descriptions of rating types.

Predictive Rating +22.2 5
Results Rating +20.0 13
Consistency 0.18 319
Pace 65.1 272
Improvement +0.7 164

Overall 1st FGA Second Chance TOs Free
throws		 Shot Selection
Offense A+ 1 A- A+ A B B-
Defense B+ 31 A A- F+ A+ A+

Offense Breakdown
Attempts Conversion Rate Total Effect
Close Shots 36% 272 A- 68% 18 +1.7 113
2 Pt. Jumpers 20% 346 B 43% 46 -2.5 297
Three Pointers 52% 16 B 37% 71 +7.9 12
Shot Selection/Accuracy B- +0.9 71 A- +5.9 25
1st FG Attempt A- 1.16 23
Second Chance A+ 42.2% 3 A 1.25 8 A+ 0.53 2
Opponents' Steals B 8.1% 57
Other Turnovers A 4.6% 2
Turnovers A 12.7% 11
Freethrows C+ 0.31 157 A 79% 5 B 0.25 73
Total Offense A+ +15.3 1

Assists Blocks (Opponents')
Close Shots C- 44% 257 B+ 7.8% 33
2 Pt. Jumpers Shots C- 22% 217 C+ 4.2% 126
Three Pointers D+ 80% 278 B 0.3% 47
Total C 56% 174 A- 3.4% 12

Defense Breakdown
Attempts Conversion Rate Total Effect
Close Shots 27% 361 A- 49% 18 -9.1 4
2 Pt. Jumpers 32% 6 B+ 33% 31 +2.8 346
Three Pointers 41% 155 B- 32% 75 -1.2 133
Shot Selection/Accuracy A+ -2.2 3 A- -5.4 26
1st FG Attempt A 0.87 11
Second Chance A- 24.1% 14 B+ 0.91 34 A- 0.22 13
Turnovers from Steals F+ 6.6% 348
Other Turnovers D+ 6.6% 269
Turnovers F+ 13.2% 349
Freethrows A+ 0.16 1 B 70% 41 A+ 0.11 1
Total Defense B+ +6.8 31

Assists Blocks
Close Shots A- 38% 16 A- 17.0% 30
2 Pt. Jumpers Shots B- 20% 85 A 9.9% 14
Three Pointers C+ 83% 144 B 1.8% 44
Total B 49% 48 A- 8.4% 24

Miscellaneous
Offense Defense
Possession Length 17.7 219 18.4 320
Fast Break Points Per Possession 0.13 283 0.12 37
Consistency 0.11 104 0.13 258
Improvement +2.4 71 -1.8 281

NCAA Tournament Selection
At-Large Selection Status Lock
Projected Seeding 3 seed  

Prediction Ranges
Pessimistic
5th Percentile 		Expected
50th Percentile 		Optimistic
95th Percentile
Predictive Rating Rank 8 5 4
Results Rating Rank 18 13 5
Conference Record 14 - 6 15 - 5 15 - 5
Conference Finish 4 2 2
NCAA Tourney Seed 4 3 1
NCAA Tourney Finish 2nd Round Sweet 16 Champ Game

NowWin NextLose Next
#1 Overall Seed 1% 1% 0%
#1 Seed 9% 10% 2%
Top 2 Seed 40% 41% 16%
Top 4 Seed 95% 96% 84%
Top 6 Seed 100% 100% 100%
NCAA Tourney Bid 100% 100% 100%
At-Large Bid if not Auto Qualifier 100% 100% 100%
Average Seed 2.8 2.8 3.5
.500 or above 100% 100% 100%
.500 or above in Conference 100% 100% 100%
Conference Champion 0% 0% 0%
Last Place in Conference 0% 0% 0%
First Four0% 0% 0%
First Round100% 100% 100%
Second Round98% 98% 96%
Sweet Sixteen73% 73% 65%
Elite Eight43% 43% 33%
Final Four22% 22% 17%
Championship Game11% 11% 8%
National Champion5% 5% 4%
Next Game: Oregon (Home) - 95.5% chance of victory

Projected Record by Quadrant
QuadProjectedProjected Cumulative
Quad 1a6 - 76 - 7
Quad 1b3 - 09 - 7
Quad 26 - 114 - 8
Quad 35 - 020 - 8
Quad 46 - 025 - 8


Date Opponent Result/Prediction Lead Record Total Rating Offense Defense
Avg Time Overall Conf Total First
FGA		 2nd Chance TOs Total First
FGA		 2nd Chance TOs
 Mon, Nov 3 344 Jackson St. W 113 - 55 100% +33  97% 1 - 0 A+ +43 A+ +21 A+ A+ C- A+ +18 A- A+ F
 Fri, Nov 7 257 Florida Gulf Coast W 113 - 70 99% +31  99% 2 - 0 A+ +35 A+ +25 A+ A+ A+ B+ +6 A+ A+ F
 Tue, Nov 11 12 Texas Tech W 81 - 77 72% +4  84% 3 - 0 A +20 A- +10 A- A+ D+ A +10 C+ A+ B+
 Fri, Nov 14 250 Colgate W 84 - 65 99% +11  95% 4 - 0 B +11 B+ +8 F+ A+ A B +4 B+ A- F
 Wed, Nov 19 17 Alabama L 86 - 90 63% -1  53% 4 - 1 A- +15 B +6 A- A C+ A +9 B C+ C
 Sat, Nov 22 218 LIU Brooklyn W 98 - 58 99% +26  93% 5 - 1 A+ +34 A+ +20 A+ A+ B- A+ +14 B A+ B+
 Mon, Nov 24 144 UT Rio Grande Valley W 87 - 73 98% +8  80% 6 - 1 B+ +12 A- +11 A- B- C+ C+ +1 A- C+ F
 Fri, Nov 28 9 Connecticut L 61 - 74 55% -10  0% 6 - 2 B- +8 C- -0 D C A A- +8 B A+ C-
 Sat, Dec 6 19 Tennessee W 75 - 62 64% +4  80% 7 - 2 A+ +31 A+ +20 A A+ A+ A+ +13 A+ C- B+
 Tue, Dec 9 36 @Ohio St. W 88 - 80 69% +4  87% 8 - 2 1 - 0 A+ +25 A+ +19 A+ C- A B+ +6 A C F
 Sat, Dec 13 13 Nebraska L 80 - 83 72% -6  1% 8 - 3 1 - 1 B+ +13 A+ +23 A A+ A+ F -11 C- C- F+
 Mon, Dec 22 47 Missouri W 91 - 48 84% +17  91% 9 - 3 A+ +54 A+ +30 B+ A+ C A+ +29 A+ A+ D+
 Mon, Dec 29 276 Southern W 90 - 55 99% +20  99% 10 - 3 A+ +26 A+ +18 A+ A+ D- A +11 A+ C- F+
 Sat, Jan 3 117 @Penn St. W 73 - 65 93% +10  99% 11 - 3 2 - 1 B+ +14 C +1 F C- A A+ +14 A+ B- F
 Thu, Jan 8 113 Rutgers W 81 - 55 97% +17  95% 12 - 3 3 - 1 A+ +26 A +12 A F A+ A+ +16 A A+ F+
 Sun, Jan 11 24 @Iowa W 75 - 69 63% +10  99% 13 - 3 4 - 1 A+ +25 A +12 A- C+ A- A+ +13 A+ A D
 Wed, Jan 14 65 @Northwestern W 79 - 68 83% +5  82% 14 - 3 5 - 1 A +23 A+ +23 A A+ A B- +2 A+ F C-
 Sat, Jan 17 58 Minnesota W 77 - 67 92% +2  55% 15 - 3 6 - 1 A- +16 A+ +15 B A+ B B- +2 A F F
 Wed, Jan 21 102 Maryland W 89 - 70 96% +12  76% 16 - 3 7 - 1 A +21 A+ +17 B- A+ A+ B +4 A- B+ F
 Sat, Jan 24 7 @Purdue W 88 - 82 42% -3  22% 17 - 3 8 - 1 A+ +30 A+ +30 A+ A+ B C+ +0 D A+ F
 Thu, Jan 29 48 Washington W 75 - 66 90% +5  85% 18 - 3 9 - 1 A- +17 A+ +14 C- A+ A+ B +4 D+ A+ B-
 Sun, Feb 1 13 @Nebraska W 78 - 69 51% +2  51% 19 - 3 10 - 1 A+ +31 A+ +24 A A- A+ A- +8 B B+ C-
 Wed, Feb 4 65 Northwestern W 84 - 44 93% +26  91% 20 - 3 11 - 1 A+ +46 A+ +20 A+ A+ C+ A+ +31 A+ A+ F
 Sat, Feb 7 10 @Michigan St. L 82 - 85 OT 48% +2  63% 20 - 4 11 - 2 A +20 A+ +18 C+ A- A+ C+ +2 B A F
 Tue, Feb 10 30 Wisconsin L 90 - 92 OT 84% +2  54% 20 - 5 11 - 3 B +10 A +14 A+ A- D+ D+ -4 C A F
 Sun, Feb 15 40 Indiana W 71 - 51 87% +9  87% 21 - 5 12 - 3 A+ +30 A+ +16 B- A+ A+ A+ +19 A+ A B-
 Wed, Feb 18 59 @USC W 101 - 65 82% +21  98% 22 - 5 13 - 3 A+ +48 A+ +31 A+ A+ A A+ +16 A+ B+ B
 Sat, Feb 21 35 @UCLA L 94 - 95 OT 69% +5  63% 22 - 6 13 - 4 A- +16 A+ +22 C+ A+ A+ D -6 D- A F
 Fri, Feb 27 1 Michigan L 70 - 84 44% -7  17% 22 - 7 13 - 5 B +10 A- +11 B- A+ B+ C -1 A- F C
 Tue, Mar 3 84 Oregon W 83 - 65 95%
 Sun, Mar 8 102 @Maryland W 83 - 68 91%
Totals 24 - 7 15 - 5 +22 A+ +15 A+ A- B- B+ +7 B A B



Game Detail
Grades are adjusted for opponent strength in each category. Game stats are not adjusted for oppoent strength. See methodology page for descriptions of rating types.
Offense Defense
Tot Off First Field Goal Attempt Second Chance TOs Freethrows Tot Def First Field Goal Attempt Second Chance TOs Freethrows
Shot Accuracy Shot Selection Points Per Shot Shot Accuracy Shot Selection Points Per Shot
2 C 2 L 3 Tot 2 C 2 L 3 Tot Off Reb PPP Tot Att Perc Tot 2 C 2 L 3 Tot 2 C 2 L 3 Tot Off Reb PPP Tot Att Perc Tot
Season Ratings A+ A- B B A- 36% 20% 52% B- A- A+ A A+ A C+ A B B+ A- B+ B- A- 27% 32% 41% A+ A A- B+ A- F+ A+ B A+
1.31 68% 43% 37% +6 +1 1.16 42% 1.3 .53 13% .31 79% .25 0.99 49% 33% 32% -5 -2 0.87 24% 0.9 .22 13% .16 70% .22
Nov
3		 Jackson St. A+ D B A+ A+ 32% 9% 59% C+ A+ A+ A- A+ C- B F C A+ D- A A B 13% 42% 45% A+ A- A+ A+ A+ F B+ B+ A-
1.50 56% 40% 52% +15 +1 1.34 58% 1.2 .72 16% .38 67% .25 0.73 63% 28% 26% -9 -5 0.75 9% 0.3 .02 15% .22 71% .15
Nov
7		 Florida Gulf Coast A+ A+ B B A+ 38% 13% 49% B- A+ A- A+ A+ A+ A+ A+ A+ B+ B- A B A 20% 45% 35% A+ A+ A- A+ A+ F A+ F B+
1.51 86% 43% 37% +13 +1 1.31 39% 1.5 .61 9% .50 88% .44 0.93 54% 30% 30% -6 -5 0.80 25% 0.5 .13 1% .16 92% .15
Nov
11		 Texas Tech A- A- A- D B+ 35% 25% 40% B+ A- A- A+ A+ D+ A+ B- A+ A F F A+ C 29% 34% 37% A+ C+ A+ A A+ B+ A+ C- A+
1.13 67% 46% 29% +2 -1 1.04 32% 1.3 .41 18% .39 70% .27 1.07 82% 55% 27% +9 -2 1.15 23% 0.9 .20 18% .07 75% .05
Nov
14		 Colgate B+ C+ F F F+ 25% 15% 60% D+ F+ A+ A- A+ A A A+ A+ B F C+ A C+ 19% 49% 32% A+ B+ A+ C- A- F A+ F A
1.26 62% 25% 28% -6 0 0.89 45% 1.2 .52 10% .40 88% .35 0.97 73% 39% 28% +1 -5 0.93 17% 1.0 .17 7% .15 89% .13
Nov
19		 Alabama B A- F B+ A- 37% 18% 45% B+ A- B+ A A C+ B+ F C+ A C- B+ D+ B- 26% 19% 56% A+ B A F C+ C C B- C+
1.09 64% 18% 37% 0 0 1.03 33% 1.1 .38 14% .33 59% .19 1.14 64% 40% 37% +4 -1 1.09 28% 1.4 .39 13% .33 74% .25
Nov
22		 LIU Brooklyn A+ A+ A+ D A+ 55% 22% 24% C A+ A+ A+ A+ B- F B D- A+ A+ D D B- 28% 30% 42% A B A+ A+ A+ B+ A+ A A+
1.38 77% 58% 31% +13 +1 1.31 50% 1.3 .65 17% .25 73% .19 0.81 40% 44% 36% -2 -2 0.94 25% 0.6 .14 24% .13 57% .07
Nov
24		 UT Rio Grande Valley A- A+ D F A- 34% 11% 55% B A- C A- B- C+ B- A+ A C+ A- A+ F B 28% 34% 38% A+ A- B D+ C+ F C- A+ A-
1.24 94% 33% 28% +7 +1 1.17 32% 1.0 .32 16% .37 86% .32 1.04 50% 20% 45% -2 -3 0.93 24% 1.1 .27 6% .24 50% .12
Nov
28		 Connecticut C- D- A+ F F+ 44% 8% 48% A D B+ F+ C A C- A+ A A- B+ F C B 35% 15% 50% B- B C+ A+ A+ C- C C+ C
0.92 43% 50% 20% -16 +2 0.75 31% 0.7 .21 15% .32 94% .30 1.12 56% 63% 35% +3 0 1.10 36% 0.8 .28 15% .30 71% .21
Dec
6		 Tennessee A+ B- D+ B- A- 48% 6% 46% A+ A A- A+ A+ A+ D F D- A+ A+ A+ B A+ 45% 21% 34% C+ A+ F B C- B+ C A+ A+
1.22 58% 33% 35% 0 +3 1.08 32% 1.4 .44 10% .25 57% .14 1.01 43% 10% 31% -14 0 0.74 53% 1.0 .51 21% .37 44% .16
Dec
9		 Ohio St. A+ C- B- A+ A+ 23% 26% 51% C A+ C D C- A A+ A+ A+ B+ D+ C+ A- A+ 24% 26% 50% B A A+ F C F B- B+ B
1.26 55% 42% 46% +9 -2 1.17 28% 0.9 .25 13% .53 91% .48 1.15 69% 43% 30% +1 -2 1.00 20% 1.9 .37 9% .33 71% .24
Dec
13		 Nebraska A+ A+ A+ D- A 26% 21% 53% B A A+ A+ A+ A+ A+ C+ A+ F D- D+ F D 27% 29% 45% A+ C- C C- C- F+ A+ F A+
1.27 83% 50% 28% +4 -1 1.09 41% 1.5 .59 13% .36 70% .25 1.31 73% 38% 44% +11 -2 1.20 28% 1.1 .31 10% .14 88% .12
Dec
22		 Missouri A+ B+ C A- A 18% 25% 57% D+ B+ A+ A+ A+ C A+ B+ A+ A+ A+ A+ B A+ 28% 32% 40% A+ A+ A- A+ A+ D+ A B- A
1.46 63% 36% 40% +6 -2 1.09 56% 1.9 1.07 18% .39 80% .31 0.77 38% 20% 32% -13 -2 0.72 30% 0.4 .13 16% .29 67% .19
Dec
29		 Southern A+ A+ F A+ A+ 30% 11% 59% B- A+ A+ C A+ D- C- A+ B+ A B- A+ A+ A+ 31% 44% 25% A+ A+ D+ C C- F+ A+ F+ A+
1.39 93% 20% 44% +18 +1 1.39 55% 1.1 .62 22% .36 89% .32 0.85 53% 21% 21% -14 -4 0.67 31% 1.0 .31 12% .14 75% .11
Jan
3		 Penn St. C B- F F F 33% 16% 51% C F B+ F C- A A+ A A+ A+ A+ B A+ A+ 28% 14% 58% B- A+ C+ B- B- F A+ A+ A+
1.08 63% 25% 24% -8 0 0.86 36% 0.9 .33 15% .49 82% .40 0.96 44% 38% 24% -13 0 0.77 29% 1.1 .33 10% .23 64% .15
Jan
8		 Rutgers A C+ A+ B+ A+ 31% 16% 53% C+ A B- F F A+ A+ A+ A+ A+ A+ C+ B- A- 18% 48% 34% A+ A A+ B+ A+ F+ A+ A+ A+
1.26 60% 75% 38% +10 0 1.22 34% 0.3 .11 11% .37 86% .31 0.85 30% 37% 32% -7 -5 0.79 21% 1.0 .21 11% .14 38% .05
Jan
11		 Iowa A B+ F C B+ 46% 8% 46% A A- B D+ C+ A- F A+ F A+ D+ A+ B+ A+ 32% 21% 46% A A+ A A- A D A+ F A+
1.14 67% 25% 33% +3 +2 1.12 30% 0.9 .27 18% .20 82% .17 1.04 67% 25% 31% -2 -1 0.96 26% 0.9 .23 12% .10 100% .10
Jan
14		 Northwestern A+ C- A+ A A 27% 16% 57% C A A+ A+ A+ A F A+ D- B- A+ B+ B- A+ 21% 28% 51% A+ A+ F F F C- C+ F D
1.33 54% 50% 39% +5 0 1.12 45% 1.4 .61 13% .16 100% .16 1.14 11% 33% 32% -13 -2 0.72 41% 1.7 .69 12% .32 88% .29
Jan
17		 Minnesota A+ C+ A+ C+ B+ 22% 22% 57% C- B A+ B A+ B A+ A+ A+ B- F A+ B- B+ 19% 30% 52% A+ A C- F F F A+ F A+
1.25 60% 50% 35% +4 -1 1.07 46% 0.9 .43 16% .37 84% .31 1.09 80% 25% 32% -1 -3 0.94 31% 1.4 .42 11% .05 100% .05
Jan
21		 Maryland A+ C- A+ C+ B 17% 19% 64% D- B- A+ A A+ A+ A+ C+ A+ B F B A B- 15% 36% 49% A+ A- A+ F B+ F A+ A+ A+
1.31 56% 50% 35% +3 -1 1.06 41% 1.2 .49 10% .46 71% .33 1.03 78% 33% 28% -3 -4 0.88 22% 1.4 .32 7% .25 50% .13
Jan
24		 Purdue A+ F A+ A+ A+ 17% 12% 71% B A+ A+ A+ A+ B A+ A- A+ C+ F F F+ F+ 33% 36% 31% A+ D A+ A+ A+ F A+ F A
1.39 29% 60% 50% +15 0 1.31 45% 1.4 .62 16% .41 73% .30 1.29 78% 55% 41% +16 -2 1.29 13% 0.7 .09 5% .18 82% .15
Shot Accuracy Shot Selection PPS 2nd Chance TOs Freethrows Shot Accuracy Shot Selection PPS 2nd Chance TOs Freethrows
Jan
29		 Washington A+ D+ A+ F D 38% 10% 52% A+ C- A+ A+ A+ A+ B- F+ C B F F C+ F+ 21% 40% 38% A+ D+ C A+ A+ B- A+ F A
1.23 53% 60% 23% -8 +1 0.88 38% 1.7 .65 8% .28 63% .18 1.08 80% 53% 33% +10 -4 1.15 35% 0.4 .13 16% .16 100% .16
Feb
1		 Nebraska A+ A+ D- D+ A 29% 15% 56% A A A B- A- A+ A+ A+ A+ A- A+ A- F C+ 21% 21% 58% A+ B A+ F B+ C- A+ D A+
1.23 86% 29% 30% +3 0 1.08 34% 0.9 .31 13% .47 81% .38 1.09 45% 27% 45% +5 -1 1.09 17% 1.3 .23 13% .09 80% .07
Feb
4		 Northwestern A+ A+ F A+ A+ 21% 8% 71% B- A+ A- A+ A+ C+ C- A C+ A+ A+ B- A+ A+ 22% 37% 41% A+ A+ A+ A+ A+ F A+ A+ A+
1.33 70% 25% 44% +12 0 1.27 39% 1.3 .50 17% .27 79% .21 0.70 46% 36% 17% -14 -3 0.68 13% 0.3 .04 2% .06 50% .03
Feb
7		 Michigan St. A+ C+ F D+ C 30% 16% 54% B- C+ A+ C+ A- A+ A+ A+ A+ C+ C D C C+ 29% 41% 30% A+ B C+ A+ A F C F D-
1.15 56% 20% 30% -7 0 0.89 31% 0.8 .25 6% .36 83% .30 1.19 63% 43% 35% +4 -3 1.04 39% 0.8 .32 11% .36 87% .32
Feb
10		 Wisconsin A A+ D- A+ A+ 25% 16% 58% C+ A+ B- A+ A- D+ B+ F C D+ C- A+ F D+ 29% 21% 50% A C C A+ A F A+ B+ A+
1.23 79% 33% 44% +13 0 1.27 28% 1.3 .34 18% .31 58% .18 1.25 63% 21% 45% +7 -1 1.14 32% 0.9 .27 5% .20 71% .14
Feb
15		 Indiana A+ A+ C F C+ 34% 15% 51% A- B- A+ B- A+ A+ F A+ F A+ C- C A+ A+ 24% 29% 47% A+ A+ A+ F A B- A+ D- A+
1.25 67% 38% 26% -3 0 0.96 42% 1.1 .47 4% .13 86% .11 0.90 64% 46% 24% -3 -2 0.91 15% 1.3 .19 16% .13 83% .11
Feb
18		 USC A+ B+ C A+ A+ 48% 10% 42% A A+ A+ A+ A+ A A+ A+ A+ A+ A+ A F A+ 39% 31% 30% B+ A+ B+ B B+ B A- A+ A+
1.41 63% 40% 48% +11 +2 1.28 43% 1.3 .57 13% .42 92% .38 0.91 33% 29% 44% -8 -1 0.83 32% 0.9 .29 20% .35 60% .21
Feb
21		 UCLA A+ A F D- C 30% 7% 63% A- C+ A+ A+ A+ A+ A+ A A+ D C F F D- 39% 20% 41% F+ D- A A- A F B+ F C+
1.29 71% 0% 29% -4 +1 0.96 51% 1.4 .69 12% .49 81% .39 1.30 61% 50% 46% +11 0 1.24 26% 1.0 .26 7% .28 84% .24
Feb
27		 Michigan A- D C- D+ B- 18% 29% 53% D+ B- A A+ A+ B+ C B- C+ C C- C- C+ B+ 34% 24% 42% A+ A- C+ F F C A- F B-
1.05 44% 33% 30% -7 -3 0.82 34% 1.7 .57 15% .21 75% .16 1.27 65% 42% 33% +3 -1 1.06 38% 2.0 .76 15% .30 82% .25



Numbers in tables represent percent chance of outcome occurring.



Projected Big Ten Finish

0-20 1-19 2-18 3-17 4-16 5-15 6-14 7-13 8-12 9-11 10-10 11-9 12-8 13-7 14-6 15-5 16-4 17-3 18-2 19-1 20-0 Total
1st 1st
2nd 0.5 53.3 53.8 2nd
3rd 0.0 3.3 31.1 34.4 3rd
4th 0.1 5.8 2.9 8.8 4th
5th 0.3 2.6 3.0 5th
6th 0.1 0.1 6th
7th 7th
8th 8th
9th 9th
10th 10th
11th 11th
12th 12th
13th 13th
14th 14th
15th 15th
16th 16th
17th 17th
18th 18th
Total 0.5 12.3 87.2 Total



Big Ten Regular Season Championship

Record Champion Total Outright 2-Way 3-Way 4-Way 5-Way 6-Way 7-Way 8-Way
20-0
19-1
18-2
17-3
16-4
15-5 0.0%
14-6 0.0%
13-7 0.0%
12-8
11-9
10-10
Total



NCAA Tournament Selection

Conf RecordRecord ChanceTourney
Bid		AutoAt-LargeAvg
Seed		 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 No Bid At-Large if not Auto
20-0
19-1
18-2
17-3
16-4
15-5 87.2% 100.0% 17.3% 82.7% 2.7 9.2 28.5 29.1 17.7 2.7 0.0 100.0%
14-6 12.3% 100.0% 12.5% 87.5% 3.5 0.2 1.8 4.1 4.6 1.6 0.1 100.0%
13-7 0.5% 100.0% 6.7% 93.3% 4.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 100.0%
12-8
11-9
10-10
9-11
8-12
7-13
6-14
5-15
4-16
3-17
2-18
1-19
0-20
Total 100% 100.0% 16.7% 83.3% 2.8 100.0%


Best / Worst Case Scenarios

ChanceTourney
Bid		Avg
Seed		 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
Win Out 15.1% 100.0% 1.8 30.3 57.4 11.7 0.5
Win Out, Lose in Conf. Tourney Championship 14.7% 100.0% 2.4 12.6 44.1 33.7 9.1 0.5
Win Out, Lose in Conf. Tourney Semi-Final 31.1% 100.0% 2.8 6.6 30.3 40.6 20.7 1.9 0.0