UNC Wilmington
Colonial Athletic
2019-20 - 2025-26 - 2026-27
Switch to All-time Team Page
Predictive Rating +3.3 112
Expected Predictive Rating +5.8 89
Pace 63.6 319
Improvement -0.1 193

Overall 1st FGA Second Chance TOs Free
throws		 Shot Selection
Offense C+ 113 D+ B- B- B- D+
Defense C+ 133 B- C+ D- B B+

Offense Breakdown
Attempts Conversion Rate Total Effect
Close Shots 34% 302 D+ 55% 252 -3.6 299
2 Pt. Jumpers 25% 96 D+ 34% 295 +0.6 137
Three Pointers 41% 178 C+ 34% 155 +0.5 159
Shot Selection/Accuracy D+ -0.8 294 C- -1.6 226
1st FG Attempt D+ 0.97 251
Second Chance B- 33.8% 86 B- 1.10 82 B- 0.37 69
Turnovers B- 15.3% 82
Freethrows B 0.35 48 D+ 70% 256 B- 0.25 94
Total Offense C+ +2.1 113

Defense Breakdown
Attempts Conversion Rate Total Effect
Close Shots 30% 349 D+ 61% 263 +3.9 60
2 Pt. Jumpers 25% 62 D+ 41% 284 -2.3 336
Three Pointers 45% 66 A- 29% 25 +1.0 138
Shot Selection/Accuracy B+ -1.1 30 C+ -1.5 115
1st FG Attempt B- 0.97 93
Second Chance B 26.9% 57 D+ 1.08 268 C+ 0.29 114
Turnovers D- 14.0% 331
Freethrows B+ 0.25 30 D+ 74% 276 B 0.18 43
Total Defense C+ +1.2 133

Miscellaneous
Offense Defense
Possession Length 18.6 313 17.6 239
Fast Break Points Per Possession 0.12 328 0.17 172
Improvement -0.8 #239 +0.7 #146

See methodology page for descriptions of rating types.
NowWin NextLose Next
#1 Overall Seed 0% 0% 0%
#1 Seed 0% 0% 0%
Top 2 Seed 0% 0% 0%
Top 4 Seed 0% 0% 0%
Top 6 Seed 0% 0% 0%
NCAA Tourney Bid 26% 28% 24%
At-Large Bid if not Auto Qualifier 0% 0% 0%
Average Seed 12.8 12.7 13.0
.500 or above 100% 100% 100%
.500 or above in Conference 100% 100% 100%
Conference Champion 94% 98% 88%
Last Place in Conference 0% 0% 0%
First Four0% 0% 0%
First Round26% 28% 24%
Second Round2% 2% 2%
Sweet Sixteen0% 0% 0%
Elite Eight0% 0% 0%
Final Four0% 0% 0%
Championship Game0% 0% 0%
National Champion0% 0% 0%

Next Game: Hofstra (Home) - 61.5% chance of victory

Projected Seeding 14 seed  

Projected Record by Quad
QuadProjectedProjected Cumulative
Quad 1a0 - 00 - 0
Quad 1b0 - 00 - 0
Quad 20 - 10 - 1
Quad 39 - 39 - 5
Quad 416 - 225 - 7


Date Opponent Result/Prediction Lead Record Total Rating Offense Defense
Avg Time Overall Conf Total First
FGA		 2nd Chance TOs Total First
FGA		 2nd Chance TOs
 Mon, Nov 10 147 @Kent St. L 77 - 86 49% -8  0% 0 - 1 D+ -5 C +0 F A- A+ D+ -5 F B- D-
 Sat, Nov 15 303 South Carolina Upstate W 73 - 60 91% +8  77% 1 - 1 C+ +2 B- +4 D+ A C- C -1 B D- C
 Tue, Nov 18 251 East Carolina W 85 - 60 86% +12  89% 2 - 1 A- +17 A- +11 A+ C C- B+ +7 B B+ D
 Fri, Nov 21 235 @Radford W 81 - 73 67% +8  95% 3 - 1 B- +7 B- +4 B B+ D- B- +3 D B B
 Wed, Nov 26 270 SE Louisiana W 70 - 57 88% -1  37% 4 - 1 C+ +4 C+ +2 D C- A- B- +3 B- B+ F
 Fri, Nov 28 169 Navy W 87 - 57 74% +21  99% 5 - 1 A+ +27 A+ +19 A+ A+ F A +10 A+ A+ D-
 Sat, Nov 29 363 Gardner-Webb W 88 - 62 98% +12  79% 6 - 1 C+ +4 C+ +3 B- D+ A C+ +2 C- A C-
 Wed, Dec 3 166 Marshall W 70 - 69 74% +1  57% 7 - 1 C- -2 C +0 F C+ A+ C- -3 B+ F C
 Sat, Dec 6 293 @Louisiana W 70 - 63 78% +3  75% 8 - 1 C+ +2 C +1 D C C+ B- +2 C+ C- D-
 Sat, Dec 13 163 @Valparaiso W 73 - 70 53% -2  38% 9 - 1 B- +6 B+ +8 F+ A+ B+ C- -2 A- F+ F
 Sat, Dec 20 238 Howard L 66 - 67 84% -4  28% 9 - 2 D -8 D- -7 F A C C- -2 C C- C
 Mon, Dec 29 286 @N.C. A&T W 87 - 78 76% -1  48% 10 - 2 1 - 0 C+ +5 C+ +3 C D+ D- C+ +1 C A F
 Wed, Dec 31 228 Drexel W 65 - 53 83% +8  92% 11 - 2 2 - 0 B- +5 C- -1 F B A+ B+ +8 A+ F C-
 Sat, Jan 3 244 Hampton W 49 - 45 85% +4  81% 12 - 2 3 - 0 C- -4 F -20 F D+ D+ A+ +17 A+ A+ F
 Thu, Jan 8 282 @Northeastern W 87 - 78 76% +1  48% 13 - 2 4 - 0 B- +5 B- +4 F B C- C+ +1 C- B- F
 Sat, Jan 10 221 @Stony Brook W 75 - 71 64% -8  26% 14 - 2 5 - 0 C+ +4 B +6 B- A C C -1 B- F D
 Sat, Jan 17 191 Campbell W 78 - 75 79% -4  22% 15 - 2 6 - 0 C- -2 C +1 C- F A+ C- -3 F A+ B
 Thu, Jan 22 129 @William & Mary L 70 - 77 44% -11  0% 15 - 3 6 - 1 C- -2 D- -6 F C- C B +5 B B D-
 Sat, Jan 24 244 @Hampton W 75 - 67 68% +3  66% 16 - 3 7 - 1 B- +6 A +14 C A+ A- D -6 D D- F
 Thu, Jan 29 164 @Towson W 82 - 73 53% +3  82% 17 - 3 8 - 1 B+ +12 A+ +18 A B- A+ D -5 F+ A+ F
 Thu, Feb 5 129 William & Mary L 78 - 85 66% +2  68% 17 - 4 8 - 2 D+ -8 B- +4 A+ D- B- F -12 B+ F D
 Mon, Feb 9 162 @College of Charleston W 76 - 64 53% +9  97% 18 - 4 9 - 2 A- +15 B- +5 D B+ A+ A- +10 B B- B
 Thu, Feb 12 219 Elon W 65 - 54 81% +9  97% 19 - 4 10 - 2 B- +5 D- -6 C- C+ F A +13 A+ A- D-
 Sat, Feb 14 113 Hofstra W 71 - 68 62%
 Thu, Feb 19 189 Monmouth W 73 - 65 78%
 Sat, Feb 21 191 @Campbell W 77 - 75 58%
 Thu, Feb 26 286 N.C. A&T W 80 - 66 89%
 Sat, Feb 28 162 College of Charleston W 75 - 68 73%
 Tue, Mar 3 219 @Elon W 76 - 73 63%
Totals 23 - 6 14 - 4 +3 F +2 A C- D+ B- +1 C+ D+ B-



Game Detail
Grades are adjusted for opponent strength in each category. Game stats are not adjusted for oppoent strength. See methodology page for descriptions of rating types.
Offense Defense
Tot Off First Field Goal Attempt Second Chance TOs Freethrows Tot Def First Field Goal Attempt Second Chance TOs Freethrows
Shot Accuracy Shot Selection Points Per Shot Shot Accuracy Shot Selection Points Per Shot
2 C 2 L 3 Tot 2 C 2 L 3 Tot Off Reb PPP Tot Att Perc Tot 2 C 2 L 3 Tot 2 C 2 L 3 Tot Off Reb PPP Tot Att Perc Tot
Season Ratings C+ D+ D+ C+ C- 34% 25% 41% D+ D+ B- B- B- B- B D+ B- C+ D+ D+ A- C+ 30% 25% 45% B+ B- B D+ C+ D- B+ D+ B
1.12 55% 34% 34% -2 -1 0.97 34% 1.1 .37 15% .35 70% .25 1.07 61% 41% 29% -2 -1 0.97 27% 1.1 .29 14% .25 74% .26
Nov
10		 Kent St. C F A- F F 51% 15% 34% B+ F B A A- A+ D C D+ D+ F A- F F 23% 15% 63% B- F A+ F B- D- C- B C
1.07 42% 44% 19% -15 +2 0.75 35% 1.2 .42 10% .28 72% .20 1.19 82% 29% 43% +13 0 1.27 23% 1.4 .33 15% .39 71% .28
Nov
15		 South Carolina Upstate B- C- D- B C- 52% 30% 18% D+ D+ A+ D A C- A+ B- A+ C B C+ B- C+ 27% 38% 36% A+ B F C- D- C D- D+ F+
1.19 57% 31% 38% -2 0 0.98 50% 1.0 .50 16% .54 75% .41 0.98 50% 35% 31% -5 -3 0.87 35% 0.9 .32 18% .36 72% .26
Nov
18		 East Carolina A- A+ F+ A+ A+ 23% 23% 53% D A+ C C- C C- A+ C+ A+ B+ B D+ A C 15% 43% 43% A+ B A- B B+ D A F B+
1.27 80% 30% 48% +14 -1 1.28 31% 1.1 .34 18% .51 75% .38 0.90 50% 39% 26% -6 -5 0.81 27% 0.9 .24 15% .25 79% .19
Nov
21		 Radford B- B D B+ B 49% 13% 38% B B A+ D+ B+ D- B F D B- B A F D- 24% 14% 61% B D B B B B C+ F+ C-
1.16 65% 33% 39% +6 +2 1.17 45% 1.0 .45 21% .38 57% .22 1.04 50% 29% 40% +2 0 1.06 25% 0.9 .22 20% .34 79% .27
Nov
26		 SE Louisiana C+ A+ B F D+ 26% 28% 47% D- D C D C- A- A+ C+ A+ B- F D- A+ C+ 21% 27% 52% A- B- A- B- B+ F A+ A+ A+
1.12 82% 42% 20% -3 -2 0.93 31% 1.0 .31 16% .57 77% .44 0.91 91% 43% 15% -7 -2 0.85 21% 0.9 .18 11% .22 50% .11
Nov
28		 Navy A+ C- A+ A+ A+ 26% 35% 39% F+ A+ A+ A+ A+ F A C+ A A A- A- A+ A+ 39% 19% 43% D A+ C- A+ A+ D- A+ F A-
1.34 58% 56% 44% +13 -3 1.22 57% 1.4 .79 23% .34 76% .26 0.87 48% 30% 22% -13 0 0.76 32% 0.6 .18 15% .20 91% .18
Nov
29		 Gardner-Webb C+ A- D+ A+ B 32% 21% 47% D B- F A+ D+ A F C+ F C+ B- A+ F+ C- 35% 14% 51% C C- B A+ A C- B- F C
1.27 72% 33% 44% +11 -1 1.23 25% 1.4 .34 10% .18 73% .13 0.90 50% 0% 38% -5 +1 0.94 20% 0.5 .10 20% .24 77% .18
Dec
3		 Marshall C B+ F D- F 21% 38% 40% F F A D- C+ A+ A+ B A+ C- F D+ A+ B- 17% 42% 42% A+ B+ C+ F F C A F C+
1.12 67% 13% 29% -11 -3 0.74 43% 0.8 .33 10% .69 74% .51 1.11 88% 40% 25% 0 -4 0.94 31% 1.5 .47 18% .18 100% .18
Dec
6		 Louisiana C D- F B D- 47% 12% 42% B- D C C- C C+ A D+ B+ B- B C B- C+ 27% 25% 48% D- C+ B F C- D- C F+ D+
1.10 50% 20% 39% -3 +2 1.00 33% 1.0 .33 17% .45 71% .32 0.99 50% 38% 32% -3 -1 0.92 22% 1.1 .25 14% .24 77% .18
Dec
13		 Valparaiso B+ D+ C- F F+ 35% 20% 46% C F+ A+ C+ A+ B+ A+ F A+ C- F A+ A+ A- 28% 34% 38% B A- F B- F+ F F+ D F
1.15 56% 33% 24% -8 0 0.85 51% 0.9 .47 14% .61 58% .35 1.10 71% 24% 21% -8 -2 0.80 43% 1.0 .43 9% .42 75% .31
Dec
20		 Howard D- C- D- F F 36% 28% 36% F F B+ B+ A C B- C- C+ C- C A F D 33% 39% 27% A+ C C- C C- C A+ F A-
0.98 56% 29% 17% -13 -1 0.74 39% 1.3 .49 19% .37 70% .26 1.00 53% 25% 43% -3 -3 0.90 35% 1.1 .38 21% .23 83% .19
Dec
29		 N.C. A&T C+ F+ C A+ C 41% 20% 39% C C C+ F D+ D- A+ A A+ C+ B F B- C- 32% 33% 35% B C A+ F A F C B B-
1.15 48% 40% 45% +3 0 1.08 29% 0.8 .23 16% .55 77% .43 1.03 50% 47% 30% -1 -2 0.95 14% 1.4 .19 11% .36 71% .25
Dec
31		 Drexel C- F A F F+ 30% 37% 33% F F C A B A+ A+ D A+ B+ B F+ A+ A+ 18% 25% 57% A+ A+ F F+ F C- F B F
1.08 38% 50% 21% -8 -3 0.81 31% 1.3 .40 10% .52 71% .37 0.88 50% 45% 12% -18 -2 0.61 38% 1.1 .40 18% .39 63% .24
Jan
3		 Hampton F B- C- F F 29% 33% 38% F F C- D D+ D+ B F F A+ B C A+ A+ 33% 35% 33% B A+ A+ A+ A+ F A+ D- A+
0.82 67% 36% 19% -7 -2 0.83 28% 0.9 .26 18% .43 38% .16 0.75 50% 35% 13% -14 -2 0.69 22% 0.7 .15 13% .17 78% .14
Jan
8		 Northeastern B- F F B+ F 50% 13% 38% B+ F B- B B C- A+ A+ A+ C+ D A+ B- C 51% 15% 35% D C- A- D+ B- F F A+ D+
1.20 46% 17% 39% -6 +2 0.94 36% 1.1 .39 18% .57 88% .50 1.07 64% 25% 32% 0 +2 1.05 22% 1.1 .24 10% .36 58% .21
Jan
10		 Stony Brook B D F A+ B- 35% 17% 48% C+ B- C- A+ A C D+ F F C A F A C+ 30% 21% 49% B B- A- F F D A+ F A+
1.15 53% 13% 48% +4 0 1.10 30% 1.4 .41 15% .27 47% .13 1.08 44% 73% 27% -2 -1 0.96 22% 2.1 .47 15% .11 83% .09
Jan
17		 Campbell C B- D C- C- 54% 23% 23% B- C- C- F F A+ A+ A- A+ C- F F B- F 43% 15% 41% C+ F C+ A+ A+ B D- C D
1.15 64% 33% 33% +2 +1 1.08 29% 0.7 .20 10% .41 80% .33 1.11 70% 57% 32% +7 +1 1.17 32% 0.5 .16 21% .45 71% .32
Jan
22		 William & Mary D- F F D F 27% 12% 61% C- F C+ D+ C- C A+ D A+ B D+ F A B+ 37% 6% 58% C- B A+ F B D- D+ B- C-
0.96 38% 17% 30% -11 0 0.80 32% 0.9 .30 19% .56 67% .38 1.06 63% 67% 27% -3 +2 1.00 17% 1.5 .25 14% .35 73% .26
Jan
24		 Hampton A A- D+ F+ C 44% 29% 27% D C B A+ A+ A- A+ B- A+ D F D+ C+ F+ 24% 31% 45% B D B F D- F A+ A+ A+
1.25 72% 33% 27% +2 -1 1.05 33% 1.4 .47 13% .52 70% .37 1.12 67% 40% 32% +1 -2 1.00 30% 1.3 .39 13% .15 63% .10
Jan
29		 Towson A+ F A+ A+ A+ 24% 24% 52% D- A C+ B- B- A+ A+ B+ A+ D B- F A+ F 37% 35% 27% B- F+ A+ C A+ F F C F
1.28 42% 58% 42% +8 -1 1.14 29% 1.1 .31 6% .40 75% .30 1.14 53% 72% 21% +5 -2 1.08 18% 0.8 .14 8% .39 70% .27
Shot Accuracy Shot Selection PPS 2nd Chance TOs Freethrows Shot Accuracy Shot Selection PPS 2nd Chance TOs Freethrows
Feb
5		 William & Mary B- A A- A+ A+ 27% 25% 47% F A+ F+ C D- B- C F D F A- A+ F B+ 43% 17% 40% B B+ F F F D F C F
1.16 71% 46% 46% +14 -1 1.27 23% 1.0 .23 18% .29 56% .16 1.26 50% 13% 42% -3 +1 0.98 38% 1.6 .62 15% .42 75% .31
Feb
9		 College of Charleston B- A+ F B- D+ 23% 37% 40% F D C A+ B+ A+ B- C+ B- A- C+ F A+ B- 27% 33% 40% A+ B A F B- B D- F F
1.12 77% 14% 35% -4 -3 0.88 30% 1.3 .40 7% .27 71% .19 0.94 58% 47% 22% -4 -2 0.89 21% 1.3 .27 19% .42 83% .35
Feb
12		 Elon D- F D A C 25% 20% 55% D C- D+ A+ C+ F D F F A B+ B+ A+ A+ 29% 21% 50% A+ A+ B+ A- A- D- B A- B+
1.08 45% 33% 42% +2 -1 1.05 29% 1.4 .41 20% .25 50% .12 0.90 50% 30% 21% -14 -1 0.73 29% 0.8 .24 13% .27 64% .17



Numbers in tables represent percent chance of outcome occurring.



Projected Colonial Athletic Finish

0-18 1-17 2-16 3-15 4-14 5-13 6-12 7-11 8-10 9-9 10-8 11-7 12-6 13-5 14-4 15-3 16-2 17-1 18-0 Total
1st 0.0 2.3 16.9 31.2 30.6 13.1 94.0 1st
2nd 0.2 2.8 1.2 4.2 2nd
3rd 0.0 0.6 0.8 1.4 3rd
4th 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.3 4th
5th 0.0 0.0 0.1 5th
6th 0.0 0.0 6th
7th 7th
8th 8th
9th 9th
10th 10th
11th 11th
12th 12th
13th 13th
Total 0.1 1.1 6.0 18.1 31.2 30.6 13.1 Total



Colonial Athletic Regular Season Championship

Record Champion Total Outright 2-Way 3-Way 4-Way 5-Way 6-Way 7-Way 8-Way
18-0
17-1
16-2 100.0% 13.1    13.1
15-3 100.0% 30.6    30.6
14-4 100.0% 31.2    29.9 1.3
13-5 93.4% 16.9    8.8 7.0 1.1
12-6 39.0% 2.3    0.2 0.9 0.9 0.4 0.0
11-7 0.9% 0.0    0.0 0.0
10-8 0.0%
9-9
Total 94.0% 94.0 82.5 9.2 2.0 0.4 0.0



NCAA Tournament Selection

Conf RecordRecord ChanceTourney
Bid		AutoAt-LargeAvg
Seed		 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 No Bid At-Large if not Auto
18-0
17-1
16-2 13.1% 33.4% 33.4% 12.2 0.3 3.0 1.0 0.0 8.7
15-3 30.6% 28.8% 28.8% 12.7 0.0 3.0 5.1 0.7 21.8
14-4 31.2% 25.1% 25.1% 13.0 0.0 1.5 4.8 1.4 0.0 23.3
13-5 18.1% 22.8% 22.8% 13.2 0.0 0.4 2.5 1.2 0.1 14.0
12-6 6.0% 18.1% 18.1% 13.3 0.0 0.6 0.4 0.0 4.9
11-7 1.1% 16.9% 16.9% 13.6 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.9
10-8 0.1% 0.0 0.0 0.1
9-9
8-10
7-11
6-12
5-13
4-14
3-15
2-16
1-17
0-18
Total 100% 26.4% 26.4% 0.0% 12.8 73.6 0.0%


Optimistic / Pessimistic Scenarios

ChanceTourney
Bid		Avg
Seed		 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
Win Out 4.4% 100.0% 12.2 7.1 69.2 23.2 0.6
Win Out, Lose in Conf. Tourney Championship 2.5%
Win Out, Lose in Conf. Tourney Semi-Final 3.2%