Tulane
American Athletic
2024-25 - 2025-26 - 2026-27
Switch to All-time Team Page
All team stats adjusted for opponents. See methodology page for details.

Predictive Rating -2.3 207
Results Rating +1.1 141
Consistency 0.18 297
Pace 67.1 216
Improvement -0.5 201

Overall 1st FGA Second Chance TOs Free
throws
Shot Selection
Offense C- 197 C- D B A- C+
Defense C- 207 C- C- C+ C C

Offense Breakdown
Attempts Conversion Rate Total Effect
Close Shots 37% 232 C 58% 167 -0.9 213
2 Pt. Jumpers 31% 251 D+ 36% 260 -1.5 262
Three Pointers 45% 90 D+ 31% 290 +0.5 160
Shot Selection/Accuracy C+ +0.2 164 D+ -2.1 253
1st FG Attempt C- 0.98 237
Second Chance F+ 22.0% 350 B 1.14 46 D 0.25 314
Opponents' Steals B 8.2% 66
Other Turnovers C+ 6.7% 111
Turnovers B 14.9% 75
Freethrows A- 0.36 19 B 76% 56 A- 0.28 14
Total Offense C- -1.2 197

Assists Opponents' Blocks
Close Shots C- 45% 242 C+ 10.0% 124
2 Pt. Jumpers Shots B+ 37% 36 B- 3.9% 101
Three Pointers B- 88% 94 B- 0.5% 85
Total C+ 58% 117 B- 4.6% 67


Defense Breakdown
Attempts Conversion Rate Total Effect
Close Shots 37% 234 C+ 56% 114 -1.6 115
2 Pt. Jumpers 20% 206 C 39% 199 +0.1 201
Three Pointers 43% 106 D+ 36% 286 +2.7 309
Shot Selection/Accuracy C +0.0 173 C- +0.7 209
1st FG Attempt C- 1.04 204
Second Chance D 33.3% 301 B- 0.98 88 C- 0.33 226
Turnovers from Steals B 11.3% 52
Other Turnovers D 6.0% 327
Turnovers C+ 17.4% 136
Freethrows C- 0.32 228 B- 71% 84 C 0.22 211
Total Defense C- -1.1 207

Assists Blocks
Close Shots D+ 53% 279 B 15.1% 46
2 Pt. Jumpers Shots D 35% 319 B 7.9% 43
Three Pointers D+ 87% 269 C 0.9% 144
Total D 62% 310 B 7.6% 44

Miscellaneous
Offense Defense
Possession Length 16.8 115 18.1 299
Fast Break Points Per Possession 0.13 302 0.17 163
Consistency 0.12 181 0.12 163
Improvement -2.8 316 +2.4 80

NCAA Tournament Selection
At-Large Selection Status Out of Consideration
Projected Seeding Not in Tournament  

Prediction Ranges
Pessimistic
5th Percentile
Expected
50th Percentile
Optimistic
95th Percentile
Predictive Rating Rank 220 205 180
Results Rating Rank 172 165 132
Conference Record 8 - 10 8 - 10 9 - 9
Conference Finish 8 8 5
NCAA Tourney Seed None None None
NCAA Tourney Finish None None None

NowWin NextLose Next
#1 Overall Seed 0% 0% 0%
#1 Seed 0% 0% 0%
Top 2 Seed 0% 0% 0%
Top 4 Seed 0% 0% 0%
Top 6 Seed 0% 0% 0%
NCAA Tourney Bid 0% 0% 0%
At-Large Bid if not Auto Qualifier 0% 0% 0%
Average Seed 14.3 13.8 14.8
.500 or above 100% 100% 100%
.500 or above in Conference 27% 27% 26.9%
Conference Champion 0% 0% 0.0%
Last Place in Conference 0% 0% 0.0%
First Four0% 0% 0%
First Round0% 0% 0%
Second Round0% 0% 0%
Sweet Sixteen0% 0% 0%
Elite Eight0% 0% 0%
Final Four0% 0% 0%
Championship Game0% 0% 0%
National Champion0% 0% 0%
Next Game: North Texas (Away) - 26.9% chance of victory

Projected Record by Quadrant
QuadProjectedProjected Cumulative
Quad 1a0 - 00 - 0
Quad 1b0 - 20 - 2
Quad 22 - 42 - 6
Quad 35 - 87 - 14
Quad 410 - 117 - 16


Date Opponent Result/Prediction Lead Record Total Rating Offense Defense
Avg Time Overall Conf Total First
FGA
2nd Chance TOs Total First
FGA
2nd Chance TOs
 Mon, Nov 3 203 Samford W 85 - 72 61% +6  76% 1 - 0 B- +8 A +12 A+ F C+ C- -3 C F B+
 Sat, Nov 8 233 Texas St. W 79 - 71 69% -6  13% 2 - 0 C +1 B- +5 C F B- D+ -4 C F D
 Tue, Nov 11 299 @Louisiana W 66 - 62 62% +3  73% 3 - 0 C -1 D+ -4 F C B B- +3 B- F F+
 Fri, Nov 14 193 New Orleans L 63 - 85 60% -11  0% 3 - 1 F -27 F -11 F F A+ F -17 F F B
 Fri, Nov 21 41 Utah St. L 75 - 96 8% -6  30% 3 - 2 D+ -8 B- +5 A- D B F -13 F C- C
 Sun, Nov 23 131 Boston College W 93 - 90 OT 34% +1  54% 4 - 2 C+ +5 A +12 B- A+ A+ D- -8 C D+ D
 Fri, Nov 28 237 Nicholls St. W 82 - 72 69% +7  89% 5 - 2 C+ +3 B- +5 B F A- C- -2 F A- C-
 Tue, Dec 2 307 Grambling St. W 65 - 63 82% +0  48% 6 - 2 D -10 D+ -3 F D A+ D- -7 C- F A-
 Sat, Dec 6 69 Akron L 71 - 88 22% -8  11% 6 - 3 D -11 D -5 F D- A+ D -6 D+ F A-
 Sat, Dec 13 130 UC San Diego L 67 - 93 34% -16  8% 6 - 4 F -24 F -12 F+ F D- F+ -10 D- D+ C-
 Wed, Dec 17 190 Louisiana Tech W 61 - 53 59% +6  93% 7 - 4 C+ +3 C- -1 F B- A+ B+ +6 A+ B+ B+
 Sat, Dec 20 150 Portland St. W 63 - 61 51% +3  79% 8 - 4 C -1 D -5 F D- F B +5 A D B-
 Wed, Dec 31 235 @East Carolina W 79 - 70 47% +1  53% 9 - 4 1 - 0 B- +8 B+ +9 B- A- D+ C -1 C- B+ F
 Sun, Jan 4 128 Florida Atlantic W 69 - 66 44% -1  28% 10 - 4 2 - 0 C+ +2 D -6 D- C+ C+ A- +8 A- D- A+
 Sat, Jan 10 335 @Texas San Antonio W 85 - 52 74% +19  92% 11 - 4 3 - 0 A+ +24 B +7 B- C- C+ A+ +18 A- A- A+
 Wed, Jan 14 117 UAB L 69 - 82 41% -4  13% 11 - 5 3 - 1 D- -13 D -5 F+ B B D- -8 C- F B
 Sun, Jan 18 136 North Texas L 63 - 71 47% -6  6% 11 - 6 3 - 2 D -10 D -6 F D- A+ D+ -4 D B A
 Wed, Jan 21 128 @Florida Atlantic L 74 - 79 23% -6  5% 11 - 7 3 - 3 C +0 C +1 D C+ D C -0 F+ B+ D
 Fri, Jan 23 178 @Charlotte L 70 - 73 34% -5  19% 11 - 8 3 - 4 C -1 D -5 C- F B- B +4 D- D- A+
 Wed, Jan 28 52 South Florida L 83 - 97 17% -11  6% 11 - 9 3 - 5 D+ -6 B- +5 A+ F A F -10 B- F D+
 Sun, Feb 1 120 @Memphis W 78 - 76 22% +5  88% 12 - 9 4 - 5 B- +8 B+ +8 A D- B- C -1 A B- D
 Sun, Feb 8 87 Wichita St. L 61 - 75 29% -6  12% 12 - 10 4 - 6 D -10 F -14 F+ F D- B +4 D- A+ A+
 Wed, Feb 11 145 Temple W 77 - 66 50% +6  69% 13 - 10 5 - 6 B +9 C +1 C+ A F A- +8 A+ B+ D+
 Sun, Feb 15 117 @UAB W 55 - 54 22% +5  78% 14 - 10 6 - 6 B- +7 F+ -10 D- F C+ A+ +17 A A+ C+
 Wed, Feb 18 136 @North Texas L 63 - 70 27%
 Thu, Feb 19 136 @North Texas W 77 - 71 26% -3  20% 15 - 10 7 - 6 B +10 A +13 B- B A+ C- -3 A- F B-
 Sun, Feb 22 224 Rice W 81 - 75 66% +5  72% 16 - 10 8 - 6 C -1 C+ +3 B+ C+ C C- -3 D- A+ D+
 Wed, Feb 25 65 Tulsa L 56 - 90 21% -17  3% 16 - 11 8 - 7 F -28 F -17 F D- F+ F -13 D F+ D+
 Sun, Mar 1 52 @South Florida L 62 - 90 8% -10  7% 16 - 12 8 - 8 D- -14 F+ -9 D- D F D+ -4 C- B- D
 Thu, Mar 5 145 @Temple L 60 - 89 28% -13  4% 16 - 13 8 - 9 F -25 F -13 F+ F A F -14 F B C
 Sun, Mar 8 120 Memphis L 95 - 96 OT 42% +1  62% 16 - 14 8 - 10 C -1 A +13 B+ A A+ F -14 F B- D+
 Wed, Mar 11 120 Memphis L 72 - 77 31%
Totals 17 - 15 8 - 11 -2 C- -1 C D+ C+ C- -1 D+ B A-



Game Detail
Grades are adjusted for opponent strength in each category. Game stats are not adjusted for oppoent strength. See methodology page for descriptions of rating types.
Offense Defense
Tot Off First Field Goal Attempt Second Chance TOs Freethrows Tot Def First Field Goal Attempt Second Chance TOs Freethrows
Shot Accuracy Shot Selection Points Per Shot Shot Accuracy Shot Selection Points Per Shot
2 C 2 L 3 Tot 2 C 2 L 3 Tot Off Reb PPP Tot Att Perc Tot 2 C 2 L 3 Tot 2 C 2 L 3 Tot Off Reb PPP Tot Att Perc Tot
Season Ratings C- C D+ D+ D+ 37% 31% 45% C+ C- F+ B D B A- B A- C- C+ C D+ C- 37% 20% 43% C C- D B- C- C+ C- B- C
1.07 58% 36% 31% -2 0 0.98 22% 1.1 .25 15% .36 76% .28 1.10 56% 39% 36% +1 0 1.04 33% 1.0 .33 17% .32 71% .26
Nov
3
Samford A A- A+ A+ A+ 29% 29% 41% D+ A+ F D- F C+ D- A+ C- C- B A- F C- 25% 27% 48% A- C F D+ F B+ B A+ A-
1.31 67% 60% 52% +20 -2 1.39 9% 1.0 .09 12% .23 92% .21 1.11 54% 29% 40% +1 -2 1.00 37% 1.1 .41 17% .31 59% .18
Nov
8
Texas St. B- C+ F A+ C 41% 14% 45% C+ C F F F B- A+ A+ A+ D+ A B+ F C+ 46% 25% 29% D- C C F F D B F C+
1.18 61% 0% 45% +4 +1 1.11 19% 0.0 .00 16% .54 100% .54 1.06 45% 33% 43% -3 0 0.96 32% 1.3 .41 16% .23 85% .20
Nov
11
Louisiana D+ A+ F F F 54% 17% 29% B- F F A+ C B A+ B+ A+ B- F B- A B- 13% 31% 56% B- B- D F F F+ F A+ D
1.03 73% 0% 17% -6 +2 0.93 19% 1.8 .35 16% .50 78% .39 0.97 67% 36% 28% -5 -3 0.87 31% 1.1 .33 13% .38 52% .20
Nov
14
New Orleans F A A F F 36% 13% 51% C+ F F F F A+ A+ D+ A+ F A+ F F F 29% 17% 55% D+ F D+ F F B F B F
0.96 69% 50% 9% -14 +1 0.76 21% 0.8 .15 8% .56 71% .40 1.29 42% 57% 57% +17 0 1.36 38% 1.3 .50 21% .54 71% .39
Nov
21
Utah St. B- F F+ A+ A 20% 22% 57% D A- F A+ D B B- C+ B- F F F F F 34% 24% 42% A+ F C C- C- C C+ B+ B
1.09 30% 27% 50% +6 -2 1.10 16% 1.6 .25 19% .34 74% .25 1.40 76% 67% 52% +25 -1 1.50 36% 1.2 .44 15% .31 67% .20
Nov
23
Boston College A A D F B- 48% 24% 28% B- B- D A+ A+ A+ A+ A- A+ D- A- D+ D C- 33% 24% 43% C C B F D+ D F F F
1.18 69% 31% 20% -2 0 0.98 21% 2.1 .45 10% .51 72% .37 1.15 47% 43% 36% -1 -1 0.98 27% 1.3 .34 13% .52 78% .41
Nov
28
Nicholls St. B- A- B B+ B+ 42% 15% 44% C+ B F F F A- A+ F B C- A- F F F 40% 19% 42% C F B- A+ A- C- F A+ C-
1.19 70% 43% 38% +8 +1 1.21 24% 0.9 .21 17% .44 68% .30 1.04 47% 67% 45% +8 0 1.19 24% 0.8 .18 16% .45 42% .19
Dec
2
Grambling St. D+ D- F C- F 38% 22% 40% D F C- D- D A+ B+ B B+ D- F F+ A+ D+ 26% 17% 57% C+ C- D- F F A- F B- F
1.05 53% 20% 33% -6 0 0.89 31% 0.9 .29 11% .38 76% .29 1.02 73% 43% 25% -3 0 0.95 32% 1.3 .43 24% .43 70% .30
Dec
6
Akron D C A+ F F 25% 19% 56% D F F C+ D- A+ A C A D B- F F D 32% 12% 56% C D+ F C+ F A- D C D
1.00 57% 55% 22% -7 -1 0.86 22% 1.0 .22 11% .35 73% .25 1.24 56% 50% 43% +8 +1 1.20 42% 1.2 .52 20% .30 76% .23
Dec
13
UC San Diego F C+ D+ F F+ 42% 25% 33% C- F+ F+ F+ F D- A D+ A- F+ D+ A+ F D 53% 5% 42% F D- F A+ D+ C- C+ C C+
0.86 58% 36% 16% -10 0 0.82 20% 0.9 .17 19% .35 68% .24 1.19 63% 0% 40% +4 +3 1.17 40% 0.8 .30 15% .24 69% .17
Dec
17
Louisiana Tech C- C+ A+ F F 28% 13% 59% C F D+ A+ B- A+ A+ B A+ B+ A D A+ A+ 51% 16% 33% F A+ F A+ B+ B+ F F F
1.04 55% 80% 13% -14 0 0.74 29% 1.3 .38 12% .60 77% .46 0.90 43% 43% 13% -17 +2 0.71 46% 0.5 .22 22% .39 78% .31
Dec
20
Portland St. D F A+ F F 50% 18% 32% B F A- F D- F A+ A+ A+ B A+ F A+ A 40% 21% 38% B- A D+ D- D B- C A- B-
0.96 45% 50% 14% -14 +1 0.77 36% 0.6 .22 23% .59 83% .50 0.93 42% 60% 22% -9 0 0.85 32% 1.1 .35 20% .31 63% .19
Dec
31
East Carolina B+ F+ D A+ B 28% 28% 44% D- B- A- B- A- D+ A+ F A+ C D A+ C- C 43% 24% 33% D+ C- C- A+ B+ F B- A B
1.20 50% 33% 47% +5 -2 1.09 38% 1.2 .47 18% .50 67% .33 1.06 61% 15% 33% -5 0 0.93 35% 0.8 .28 12% .33 63% .21
Jan
4
Florida Atlantic D D+ F C+ D- 39% 19% 43% C- D- D A+ C+ C+ D A C- A- A- F A+ A- 28% 26% 46% A A- F B- D- A+ C+ A+ B
0.99 52% 10% 35% -7 0 0.89 22% 1.4 .30 16% .26 80% .20 0.95 50% 62% 22% -5 -1 0.90 41% 1.0 .41 26% .29 60% .17
Jan
10
Texas San Antonio B D F A B 22% 12% 66% D+ B- F A+ C- C+ F A+ F A+ C A+ B+ A- 33% 27% 40% B+ A- B+ A- A- A+ F A+ D+
1.24 54% 29% 41% +5 0 1.12 28% 1.4 .39 15% .12 86% .10 0.76 53% 8% 28% -13 -1 0.73 26% 0.8 .21 23% .36 58% .21
Jan
14
UAB D D+ B+ F F 40% 13% 47% B+ F+ D A+ B B A C A- D- B- A F C- 55% 28% 17% C- C- F F F B C+ F F
0.99 55% 43% 23% -9 +1 0.87 21% 1.5 .32 14% .32 74% .23 1.17 55% 27% 44% -2 0 0.98 44% 1.2 .53 14% .30 94% .28
Jan
18
North Texas D F F C+ F 25% 23% 52% D+ F F B+ D- A+ A+ A- A+ D+ A- C F D+ 47% 13% 40% D D F A+ B A F F F
0.94 36% 10% 35% -11 -1 0.77 21% 1.1 .24 16% .59 76% .44 1.06 48% 33% 39% -3 +2 1.00 44% 0.6 .28 22% .52 81% .42
Jan
21
Florida Atlantic C D- D B- D+ 45% 26% 30% D+ D D- A+ C+ D A+ A+ A+ C B- F F D- 51% 15% 34% F F+ A+ F B+ D F A+ F
1.04 48% 33% 36% -5 0 0.91 19% 1.5 .29 18% .46 85% .39 1.11 54% 57% 44% +6 +2 1.17 20% 1.3 .27 15% .48 59% .28
Jan
23
Charlotte D B A+ F C- 36% 23% 40% C- C- F A+ F B- A+ A+ A+ B F A+ C- D- 45% 9% 45% D- D- D D D- A+ D+ C D+
1.03 65% 55% 21% -2 -1 0.98 7% 2.0 .14 13% .41 83% .34 1.07 80% 0% 35% +7 +2 1.20 37% 1.0 .37 25% .35 72% .26
Jan
28
South Florida B- A C A A+ 29% 14% 57% B- A+ F+ F F A A- D+ B F D+ B A B- 44% 12% 44% B- B- D- F F D+ F B- F
1.10 69% 38% 41% +9 0 1.20 21% 0.1 .03 15% .37 67% .25 1.28 61% 33% 26% -5 +2 0.96 44% 1.6 .69 13% .53 71% .38
Shot Accuracy Shot Selection PPS 2nd Chance TOs Freethrows Shot Accuracy Shot Selection PPS 2nd Chance TOs Freethrows
Feb
1
Memphis B+ C A+ A A- 41% 9% 50% A A F A+ D- B- A+ B+ A+ C C+ D A+ A+ 35% 26% 39% C+ A F A+ B- D F F F
1.13 58% 50% 39% +5 +2 1.15 14% 1.5 .21 19% .46 77% .36 1.10 56% 42% 17% -10 -1 0.80 43% 0.9 .38 16% .65 84% .55
Feb
8
Wichita St. F B+ F F F 45% 20% 35% A F+ F F F D- A+ A+ A+ B D+ F B D 42% 16% 42% D- D- B A+ A+ A+ C- A+ B+
0.84 64% 10% 18% -12 +1 0.80 16% 0.7 .11 19% .41 83% .34 1.03 61% 56% 30% +2 +1 1.07 36% 0.6 .21 21% .33 53% .17
Feb
11
Temple C B A+ F C 49% 13% 38% A- C+ C- A+ A F A+ D- A+ A- A C+ A+ A+ 40% 16% 44% D- A+ C A+ B+ D+ F C+ F
1.13 63% 60% 27% +1 +2 1.08 27% 1.6 .43 19% .73 68% .49 0.97 45% 38% 23% -13 +1 0.78 29% 0.8 .21 12% .45 74% .33
Feb
15
UAB F+ F F+ C F+ 39% 14% 47% B D- F+ F F C+ F A+ F A+ A- A+ A+ A+ 46% 19% 35% D A D- A+ A+ C+ C A+ B
0.88 45% 29% 33% -7 +1 0.90 19% 0.6 .11 16% .09 100% .09 0.86 50% 22% 24% -12 +1 0.79 37% 0.4 .15 13% .31 59% .18
Feb
19
North Texas A A+ F B- B- 38% 21% 42% C+ B- C A B A+ A- C+ A- C- A+ F A+ B+ 45% 33% 21% A+ A- F F F B- F D+ F
1.17 72% 10% 35% 0 0 1.02 32% 1.2 .38 15% .43 71% .31 1.08 42% 43% 22% -9 -1 0.81 41% 1.3 .54 18% .54 72% .39
Feb
22
Rice C+ F A+ A+ B- 36% 2% 62% A+ B+ D- A+ C+ C A+ C+ A+ C- C A+ F D 31% 24% 45% D- D- A+ D+ A+ D+ D- F F
1.18 47% 100% 42% +5 +2 1.17 25% 1.4 .36 16% .54 74% .40 1.09 56% 25% 43% +3 -1 1.06 18% 1.0 .18 16% .35 80% .28
Feb
25
Tulsa F F C+ F F 38% 17% 46% C+ F D F+ D- F+ B F C- F C+ D+ F D 42% 9% 49% C D F B- F+ D+ A- C- A-
0.84 44% 38% 27% -10 0 0.83 22% 1.0 .22 20% .30 63% .19 1.36 57% 40% 44% +7 +2 1.20 40% 1.2 .49 14% .26 80% .21
Mar
1
South Florida F+ B+ F F+ D- 18% 18% 64% C- D- F B- D F A+ D+ A+ D+ D+ B B+ C 51% 5% 44% D+ C- C+ B- B- D D+ F F+
0.85 63% 25% 29% -7 -1 0.86 20% 1.0 .20 25% .49 67% .33 1.24 61% 33% 29% -2 +3 1.04 38% 1.1 .40 12% .39 84% .33
Mar
5
Temple F B- F F F+ 33% 26% 41% D F+ F F F A D- A D+ F D D+ F F 31% 22% 46% B- F C+ A- B C B D+ B
0.89 61% 29% 27% -6 -1 0.89 11% 0.3 .03 10% .25 80% .20 1.32 65% 42% 52% +15 -1 1.31 27% 0.9 .23 13% .31 78% .24
Mar
8
Memphis A C A+ D B+ 42% 19% 39% B B+ C- A+ A A+ F B+ D- F C- F F F 29% 37% 33% A+ F F A+ B- D+ F B F
1.23 58% 67% 29% +3 0 1.08 32% 1.3 .42 10% .26 78% .20 1.24 60% 53% 41% +10 -3 1.16 43% 0.9 .37 17% .56 69% .39




Numbers in tables represent percent chance of outcome occurring.




Projected American Athletic Finish

0-18 1-17 2-16 3-15 4-14 5-13 6-12 7-11 8-10 9-9 10-8 11-7 12-6 13-5 14-4 15-3 16-2 17-1 18-0 Total
1st 1st
2nd 2nd
3rd 3rd
4th 4th
5th 26.9 26.9 5th
6th 6th
7th 7th
8th 73.1 73.1 8th
9th 9th
10th 10th
11th 11th
12th 12th
13th 13th
Total 73.1 26.9 Total



American Athletic Regular Season Championship

Record Champion Total Outright 2-Way 3-Way 4-Way 5-Way 6-Way 7-Way 8-Way
18-0
17-1
16-2
15-3
14-4
13-5
12-6
11-7
10-8
9-9 0.0%
Total



NCAA Tournament Selection

Conf RecordRecord ChanceTourney
Bid
AutoAt-LargeAvg
Seed
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 No Bid At-Large if not Auto
18-0
17-1
16-2
15-3
14-4
13-5
12-6
11-7
10-8
9-9 26.9% 0.3% 0.3% 13.8 0.0 0.1 0.0 26.8
8-10 73.1% 0.1% 0.1% 14.8 0.0 0.1 0.0 73.0
7-11
6-12
5-13
4-14
3-15
2-16
1-17
0-18
Total 100% 0.2% 0.2% 0.0% 14.3 99.8 0.0%


Best / Worst Case Scenarios

ChanceTourney
Bid
Avg
Seed
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
Win Out, Lose in Conf. Tourney Championship 0.4%
Win Out, Lose in Conf. Tourney Semi-Final 1.7%
Lose Out 50.6%