Illinois
Big Ten
2024-25 - 2025-26 - 2026-27
Switch to All-time Team Page
All team stats adjusted for opponents. See methodology page for descriptions of rating types.

Predictive Rating +22.7 5
Results Rating +20.4 11
Consistency 0.18 316
Pace 65.4 267
Improvement +1.8 120

Overall 1st FGA Second Chance TOs Free
throws
Shot Selection
Offense A+ 1 A- A+ A B B
Defense B+ 30 A A F+ A+ A+

Offense Breakdown
Attempts Conversion Rate Total Effect
Close Shots 36% 262 A- 68% 16 +1.9 107
2 Pt. Jumpers 19% 347 B 43% 50 -2.7 308
Three Pointers 52% 15 B 37% 66 +8.0 11
Shot Selection/Accuracy B +0.9 64 A- +6.0 24
1st FG Attempt A- 1.16 22
Second Chance A+ 42.3% 3 A 1.24 11 A+ 0.52 2
Turnovers from Steals B 8.1% 53
Other Turnovers A 4.6% 2
Turnovers A 12.7% 11
Freethrows C+ 0.32 150 A 79% 5 B 0.25 69
Total Offense A+ +15.5 1

Assists Blocks (Opponents')
Close Shots C- 44% 265 B+ 7.4% 29
2 Pt. Jumpers Shots C- 23% 195 C 4.9% 182
Three Pointers D+ 80% 273 B 0.3% 49
Total C 56% 177 A- 3.4% 12

Defense Breakdown
Attempts Conversion Rate Total Effect
Close Shots 27% 361 A- 49% 17 -9.1 4
2 Pt. Jumpers 32% 6 B+ 33% 25 +2.6 344
Three Pointers 42% 149 B- 32% 80 -1.1 135
Shot Selection/Accuracy A+ -2.2 4 A- -5.5 25
1st FG Attempt A 0.87 11
Second Chance A- 23.9% 11 A- 0.88 18 A 0.21 8
Turnovers from Steals F+ 6.5% 349
Other Turnovers D+ 6.5% 281
Turnovers F+ 13.0% 352
Freethrows A+ 0.16 1 B+ 69% 30 A+ 0.11 1
Total Defense B+ +7.2 30

Assists Blocks
Close Shots A- 37% 8 A- 17.6% 26
2 Pt. Jumpers Shots B- 20% 87 A 9.9% 16
Three Pointers C 84% 166 B 1.6% 58
Total B 49% 50 A- 8.5% 22

Miscellaneous
Offense Defense
Possession Length 17.7 225 18.3 314
Fast Break Points Per Possession 0.13 283 0.12 37
Consistency 0.11 122 0.13 256
Improvement +3.1 55 -1.3 262

NCAA Tournament Selection
At-Large Selection Status Lock
Projected Seeding 2 seed  

Prediction Ranges
Pessimistic
5th Percentile
Expected
50th Percentile
Optimistic
95th Percentile
Predictive Rating Rank 7 5 3
Results Rating Rank 16 11 4
Conference Record 14 - 6 15 - 5 16 - 4
Conference Finish 4 2 2
NCAA Tourney Seed 4 2 1
NCAA Tourney Finish 2nd Round Sweet 16 Champion

NowWin NextLose Next
#1 Overall Seed 1% 2% 0%
#1 Seed 18% 25% 10%
Top 2 Seed 57% 72% 42%
Top 4 Seed 98% 100% 97%
Top 6 Seed 100% 100% 100%
NCAA Tourney Bid 100% 100% 100%
At-Large Bid if not Auto Qualifier 100% 100% 100%
Average Seed 2.4 2.1 2.7
.500 or above 100% 100% 100%
.500 or above in Conference 100% 100% 100%
Conference Champion 2% 4% 0%
Last Place in Conference 0% 0% 0%
First Four0% 0% 0%
First Round100% 100% 100%
Second Round99% 99% 98%
Sweet Sixteen75% 78% 73%
Elite Eight48% 51% 44%
Final Four26% 28% 23%
Championship Game13% 15% 12%
National Champion7% 8% 5%
Next Game: Michigan (Home) - 48.8% chance of victory

Projected Record by Quadrant
QuadProjectedProjected Cumulative
Quad 1a7 - 67 - 6
Quad 1b3 - 19 - 7
Quad 26 - 115 - 7
Quad 35 - 020 - 7
Quad 46 - 026 - 7


Date Opponent Result/Prediction Lead Record Total Rating Offense Defense
Avg Time Overall Conf Total First
FGA
2nd Chance TOs Total First
FGA
2nd Chance TOs
 Mon, Nov 3 338 Jackson St. W 113 - 55 100% +33  97% 1 - 0 A+ +43 A+ +21 A+ A+ C- A+ +18 A- A+ F
 Fri, Nov 7 252 Florida Gulf Coast W 113 - 70 99% +31  99% 2 - 0 A+ +35 A+ +25 A+ A+ A+ A- +7 A+ A+ F
 Tue, Nov 11 13 Texas Tech W 81 - 77 74% +4  84% 3 - 0 A +20 A- +10 A- A+ D+ A +10 C+ A+ B+
 Fri, Nov 14 243 Colgate W 84 - 65 99% +11  95% 4 - 0 B+ +12 B+ +8 F+ A+ A B +4 B+ A- F
 Wed, Nov 19 19 Alabama L 86 - 90 66% -1  53% 4 - 1 B+ +14 B +6 A- A C A +9 B C+ C
 Sat, Nov 22 220 LIU Brooklyn W 98 - 58 99% +26  93% 5 - 1 A+ +34 A+ +19 A+ A+ B- A+ +14 B A+ B+
 Mon, Nov 24 142 UT Rio Grande Valley W 87 - 73 98% +8  80% 6 - 1 B+ +12 A- +11 A- B- C+ C+ +1 A- C+ F
 Fri, Nov 28 9 Connecticut L 61 - 74 61% -10  0% 6 - 2 B- +7 C- -1 D C- A A- +7 B A+ C-
 Sat, Dec 6 17 Tennessee W 75 - 62 66% +4  80% 7 - 2 A+ +31 A+ +20 A A+ A+ A+ +13 A+ C- B+
 Tue, Dec 9 33 @Ohio St. W 88 - 80 69% +4  87% 8 - 2 1 - 0 A+ +26 A+ +20 A+ D+ A B+ +6 A C+ F
 Sat, Dec 13 11 Nebraska L 80 - 83 74% -6  1% 8 - 3 1 - 1 B+ +13 A+ +24 A A+ A+ F -11 C- C F+
 Mon, Dec 22 46 Missouri W 91 - 48 85% +17  91% 9 - 3 A+ +54 A+ +30 B+ A+ C A+ +30 A+ A+ D+
 Mon, Dec 29 260 Southern W 90 - 55 99% +20  99% 10 - 3 A+ +26 A+ +18 A+ A+ D- A +11 A+ C- F
 Sat, Jan 3 116 @Penn St. W 73 - 65 93% +10  99% 11 - 3 2 - 1 B+ +14 C +1 F C- A A+ +14 A+ B- F
 Thu, Jan 8 112 Rutgers W 81 - 55 97% +17  95% 12 - 3 3 - 1 A+ +26 A +12 A F A+ A+ +16 A A+ F+
 Sun, Jan 11 27 @Iowa W 75 - 69 67% +10  99% 13 - 3 4 - 1 A+ +24 A +12 A- C+ A- A+ +13 A+ A D
 Wed, Jan 14 61 @Northwestern W 79 - 68 84% +5  82% 14 - 3 5 - 1 A +23 A+ +23 A A+ A B- +2 A+ F C-
 Sat, Jan 17 58 Minnesota W 77 - 67 93% +2  55% 15 - 3 6 - 1 A- +16 A+ +15 B A+ B B- +2 A F F
 Wed, Jan 21 103 Maryland W 89 - 70 97% +12  76% 16 - 3 7 - 1 A +20 A+ +17 B- A+ A+ B +4 B+ B+ F
 Sat, Jan 24 7 @Purdue W 88 - 82 43% -3  22% 17 - 3 8 - 1 A+ +30 A+ +31 A+ A+ B C +0 D A+ F
 Thu, Jan 29 48 Washington W 75 - 66 90% +5  85% 18 - 3 9 - 1 A- +17 A +14 C- A+ A+ B +4 D+ A+ B-
 Sun, Feb 1 11 @Nebraska W 78 - 69 52% +2  51% 19 - 3 10 - 1 A+ +31 A+ +24 A A- A+ A- +8 B B+ C-
 Wed, Feb 4 61 Northwestern W 84 - 44 93% +26  91% 20 - 3 11 - 1 A+ +46 A+ +20 A+ A+ C+ A+ +31 A+ A+ F
 Sat, Feb 7 10 @Michigan St. L 82 - 85 OT 51% +2  63% 20 - 4 11 - 2 A +19 A+ +18 C+ A- A+ C+ +1 B- A F
 Tue, Feb 10 25 Wisconsin L 90 - 92 OT 83% +2  54% 20 - 5 11 - 3 B +10 A +14 A+ A- D+ D+ -4 C A- F
 Sun, Feb 15 40 Indiana W 71 - 51 88% +9  87% 21 - 5 12 - 3 A+ +30 A+ +16 B- A+ A+ A+ +19 A+ A B-
 Wed, Feb 18 59 @USC W 101 - 65 83% +21  98% 22 - 5 13 - 3 A+ +48 A+ +31 A+ A+ A A+ +17 A+ B+ B
 Sat, Feb 21 36 @UCLA L 94 - 95 OT 70% +5  63% 22 - 6 13 - 4 A- +16 A+ +22 C+ A+ A+ D -6 D- A F
 Fri, Feb 27 1 Michigan L 80 - 81 49%
 Tue, Mar 3 88 Oregon W 84 - 65 96%
 Sun, Mar 8 103 @Maryland W 83 - 68 92%
Totals 24 - 7 15 - 5 +23 A+ +16 A+ A- B B+ +7 B A B



Game Detail
Grades are adjusted for opponent strength in each category. Game stats are not adjusted for oppoent strength. See methodology page for descriptions of rating types.
Offense Defense
Tot Off First Field Goal Attempt Second Chance TOs Freethrows Tot Def First Field Goal Attempt Second Chance TOs Freethrows
Shot Accuracy Shot Selection Points Per Shot Shot Accuracy Shot Selection Points Per Shot
2 C 2 L 3 Tot 2 C 2 L 3 Tot Off Reb PPP Tot Att Perc Tot 2 C 2 L 3 Tot 2 C 2 L 3 Tot Off Reb PPP Tot Att Perc Tot
Season Ratings A+ A- B B A- 36% 19% 52% B A- A+ A A+ A C+ A B B+ A- B+ B- A- 27% 32% 42% A+ A A- A- A F+ A+ B+ A+
1.31 68% 43% 37% +6 +1 1.16 42% 1.2 .52 13% .32 79% .25 0.98 49% 33% 32% -5 -2 0.87 24% 0.9 .21 13% .16 69% .22
Nov
3
Jackson St. A+ D B A+ A+ 32% 9% 59% C+ A+ A+ A- A+ C- B- F+ C A+ D- A A B 13% 42% 45% A+ A- A+ A+ A+ F B+ B+ A-
1.50 56% 40% 52% +15 +1 1.34 58% 1.2 .72 16% .38 67% .25 0.73 63% 28% 26% -9 -5 0.75 9% 0.3 .02 15% .22 71% .15
Nov
7
Florida Gulf Coast A+ A+ B B- A+ 38% 13% 49% B- A+ A- A+ A+ A+ A+ A+ A+ A- B A B A 20% 45% 35% A+ A+ A- A+ A+ F A+ F B+
1.51 86% 43% 37% +13 +1 1.31 39% 1.5 .61 9% .50 88% .44 0.93 54% 30% 30% -6 -5 0.80 25% 0.5 .13 1% .16 92% .15
Nov
11
Texas Tech A- A- A- D B+ 35% 25% 40% B+ A- A- A+ A+ D+ A+ B- A+ A F F A+ C 29% 34% 37% A+ C+ A+ A A+ B+ A+ C- A+
1.13 67% 46% 29% +2 -1 1.04 32% 1.3 .41 18% .39 70% .27 1.07 82% 55% 27% +9 -2 1.15 23% 0.9 .20 18% .07 75% .05
Nov
14
Colgate B+ C+ F F F+ 25% 15% 60% C- F+ A+ B+ A+ A A A+ A+ B F C+ A C+ 19% 49% 32% A+ B+ A+ C- A- F A+ F A
1.26 62% 25% 28% -6 0 0.89 45% 1.2 .52 10% .40 88% .35 0.97 73% 39% 28% +1 -5 0.93 17% 1.0 .17 7% .15 89% .13
Nov
19
Alabama B A- F B+ B+ 37% 18% 45% B+ A- B+ A A C B+ F C+ A C- B+ D+ B- 26% 19% 56% A+ B A- F C+ C C+ B- B-
1.09 64% 18% 37% 0 0 1.03 33% 1.1 .38 14% .33 59% .19 1.14 64% 40% 37% +4 -1 1.09 28% 1.4 .39 13% .33 74% .25
Nov
22
LIU Brooklyn A+ A+ A+ D A+ 55% 22% 24% C A+ A+ A+ A+ B- F B D- A+ A+ D D B- 28% 30% 42% A B A+ A+ A+ B+ A+ A A+
1.38 77% 58% 31% +13 +1 1.31 50% 1.3 .65 17% .25 73% .19 0.81 40% 44% 36% -2 -2 0.94 25% 0.6 .14 24% .13 57% .07
Nov
24
UT Rio Grande Valley A- A+ D F A- 34% 11% 55% B A- C A- B- C+ B- A+ A C+ A- A+ F B 28% 34% 38% A+ A- B D+ C+ F C- A+ A-
1.24 94% 33% 28% +7 +1 1.17 32% 1.0 .32 16% .37 86% .32 1.04 50% 20% 45% -2 -3 0.93 24% 1.1 .27 6% .24 50% .12
Nov
28
Connecticut C- D- A+ F F+ 44% 8% 48% A D B+ F C- A C- A+ A A- B+ F C B 35% 15% 50% B- B C+ A+ A+ C- C C+ C+
0.92 43% 50% 20% -16 +2 0.75 31% 0.7 .21 15% .32 94% .30 1.12 56% 63% 35% +3 0 1.10 36% 0.8 .28 15% .30 71% .21
Dec
6
Tennessee A+ B- D+ B- A- 48% 6% 46% A+ A A- A+ A+ A+ D F D- A+ A+ A+ B A+ 45% 21% 34% C+ A+ F B+ C- B+ C A+ A+
1.22 58% 33% 35% 0 +3 1.08 32% 1.4 .44 10% .25 57% .14 1.01 43% 10% 31% -14 0 0.74 53% 1.0 .51 21% .37 44% .16
Dec
9
Ohio St. A+ C- B- A+ A+ 23% 26% 51% C A+ C- D D+ A A+ A+ A+ B+ D+ C+ B+ A+ 24% 26% 50% B A A+ F C+ F B- B+ B
1.26 55% 42% 46% +9 -2 1.17 28% 0.9 .25 13% .53 91% .48 1.15 69% 43% 30% +1 -2 1.00 20% 1.9 .37 9% .33 71% .24
Dec
13
Nebraska A+ A+ A+ D- A 26% 21% 53% B A A+ A+ A+ A+ A+ C+ A+ F F+ D+ F D 27% 29% 45% A+ C- C C C F+ A+ F A
1.27 83% 50% 28% +4 -1 1.09 41% 1.5 .59 13% .36 70% .25 1.31 73% 38% 44% +11 -2 1.20 28% 1.1 .31 10% .14 88% .12
Dec
22
Missouri A+ B+ C A- A 18% 25% 57% D+ B+ A+ A+ A+ C A+ B+ A+ A+ A+ A+ B A+ 28% 32% 40% A+ A+ A- A+ A+ D+ A B- A
1.46 63% 36% 40% +6 -2 1.09 56% 1.9 1.07 18% .39 80% .31 0.77 38% 20% 32% -13 -2 0.72 30% 0.4 .13 16% .29 67% .19
Dec
29
Southern A+ A+ F A+ A+ 30% 11% 59% B- A+ A+ C A+ D- C- A+ B+ A B- A+ A+ A+ 31% 44% 25% A+ A+ C- C C- F A+ D- A+
1.39 93% 20% 44% +18 +1 1.39 55% 1.1 .62 22% .36 89% .32 0.85 53% 21% 21% -14 -4 0.67 31% 1.0 .31 12% .14 75% .11
Jan
3
Penn St. C B- F F F 33% 16% 51% C F B+ F C- A A+ A- A+ A+ A+ B A+ A+ 28% 14% 58% B- A+ C+ B- B- F A+ A+ A+
1.08 63% 25% 24% -8 0 0.86 36% 0.9 .33 15% .49 82% .40 0.96 44% 38% 24% -13 0 0.77 29% 1.1 .33 10% .23 64% .15
Jan
8
Rutgers A C+ A+ B+ A+ 31% 16% 53% C+ A B- F F A+ A+ A+ A+ A+ A+ C+ B- A- 18% 48% 34% A+ A A+ B+ A+ F+ A+ A+ A+
1.26 60% 75% 38% +10 0 1.22 34% 0.3 .11 11% .37 86% .31 0.85 30% 37% 32% -7 -5 0.79 21% 1.0 .21 11% .14 38% .05
Jan
11
Iowa A B+ F C B+ 46% 8% 46% A A- B- D C+ A- F A F A+ D+ A+ B+ A+ 32% 21% 46% A- A+ A A- A D A+ F A+
1.14 67% 25% 33% +3 +2 1.12 30% 0.9 .27 18% .20 82% .17 1.04 67% 25% 31% -2 -1 0.96 26% 0.9 .23 12% .10 100% .10
Jan
14
Northwestern A+ C- A+ A A 27% 16% 57% C A A+ A+ A+ A F A+ D- B- A+ B+ B- A+ 21% 28% 51% A+ A+ F F F C- C+ F D
1.33 54% 50% 39% +5 0 1.12 45% 1.4 .61 13% .16 100% .16 1.14 11% 33% 32% -13 -2 0.72 41% 1.7 .69 12% .32 88% .29
Jan
17
Minnesota A+ C+ A+ C+ B+ 22% 22% 57% C- B A+ B- A+ B A+ A+ A+ B- F A+ B- B+ 19% 30% 52% A+ A C- F F F A+ F A+
1.25 60% 50% 35% +4 -1 1.07 46% 0.9 .43 16% .37 84% .31 1.09 80% 25% 32% -1 -3 0.94 31% 1.4 .42 11% .05 100% .05
Jan
21
Maryland A+ C- A+ C+ B 17% 19% 64% D- B- A+ A- A+ A+ A+ C+ A+ B F B A B- 15% 36% 49% A+ B+ A+ F B+ F A+ A+ A+
1.31 56% 50% 35% +3 -1 1.06 41% 1.2 .49 10% .46 71% .33 1.03 78% 33% 28% -3 -4 0.88 22% 1.4 .32 7% .25 50% .13
Jan
24
Purdue A+ F A+ A+ A+ 17% 12% 71% B+ A+ A+ A+ A+ B A+ A- A+ C F F F+ F+ 33% 36% 31% A+ D A+ A+ A+ F A+ F A
1.39 29% 60% 50% +15 0 1.31 45% 1.4 .62 16% .41 73% .30 1.29 78% 55% 41% +16 -2 1.29 13% 0.7 .09 5% .18 82% .15
Shot Accuracy Shot Selection PPS 2nd Chance TOs Freethrows Shot Accuracy Shot Selection PPS 2nd Chance TOs Freethrows
Jan
29
Washington A D+ A+ F D 38% 10% 52% A+ C- A+ A+ A+ A+ B- F+ C B F F C+ F+ 21% 40% 38% A+ D+ C A+ A+ B- A+ F A
1.23 53% 60% 23% -8 +1 0.88 38% 1.7 .65 8% .28 63% .18 1.08 80% 53% 33% +10 -4 1.15 35% 0.4 .13 16% .16 100% .16
Feb
1
Nebraska A+ A+ D- D+ A 29% 15% 56% A A A B- A- A+ A+ A+ A+ A- A+ A- F B- 21% 21% 58% A+ B A+ F B+ C- A+ D A+
1.23 86% 29% 30% +3 0 1.08 34% 0.9 .31 13% .47 81% .38 1.09 45% 27% 45% +5 -1 1.09 17% 1.3 .23 13% .09 80% .07
Feb
4
Northwestern A+ A+ F A+ A+ 21% 8% 71% B- A+ A- A+ A+ C+ C- A C+ A+ A+ B- A+ A+ 22% 37% 41% A+ A+ A+ A+ A+ F A+ A+ A+
1.33 70% 25% 44% +12 0 1.27 39% 1.3 .50 17% .27 79% .21 0.70 46% 36% 17% -14 -3 0.68 13% 0.3 .04 2% .06 50% .03
Feb
7
Michigan St. A+ C+ F D+ C 30% 16% 54% B C+ A+ B- A- A+ A+ A+ A+ C+ C- D C C 29% 41% 30% A+ B- C+ A+ A F C F D-
1.15 56% 20% 30% -7 0 0.89 31% 0.8 .25 6% .36 83% .30 1.19 63% 43% 35% +4 -3 1.04 39% 0.8 .32 11% .36 87% .32
Feb
10
Wisconsin A A+ D- A+ A+ 25% 16% 58% C+ A+ B- A+ A- D+ B+ F C D+ C- A+ F C- 29% 21% 50% A C C- A+ A- F A+ B+ A+
1.23 79% 33% 44% +13 0 1.27 28% 1.3 .34 18% .31 58% .18 1.25 63% 21% 45% +7 -1 1.14 32% 0.9 .27 5% .20 71% .14
Feb
15
Indiana A+ A+ C F C+ 34% 15% 51% A- B- A+ C+ A+ A+ F A+ F A+ C- C A+ A+ 24% 29% 47% A+ A+ A+ F A B- A+ D- A+
1.25 67% 38% 26% -3 0 0.96 42% 1.1 .47 4% .13 86% .11 0.90 64% 46% 24% -3 -2 0.91 15% 1.3 .19 16% .13 83% .11
Feb
18
USC A+ B+ C A+ A+ 48% 10% 42% A A+ A+ A+ A+ A A+ A+ A+ A+ A+ A F A+ 39% 31% 30% B+ A+ B+ B B+ B A- A+ A+
1.41 63% 40% 48% +11 +2 1.28 43% 1.3 .57 13% .42 92% .38 0.91 33% 29% 44% -8 -1 0.83 32% 0.9 .29 20% .35 60% .21
Feb
21
UCLA A+ A F D- C 30% 7% 63% A- C+ A+ A+ A+ A+ A+ A A+ D C F F D- 39% 20% 41% F+ D- A A- A F B+ F C+
1.29 71% 0% 29% -4 +1 0.96 51% 1.4 .69 12% .49 81% .39 1.30 61% 50% 46% +11 0 1.24 26% 1.0 .26 7% .28 84% .24




Numbers in tables represent percent chance of outcome occurring.




Projected Big Ten Finish

0-20 1-19 2-18 3-17 4-16 5-15 6-14 7-13 8-12 9-11 10-10 11-9 12-8 13-7 14-6 15-5 16-4 17-3 18-2 19-1 20-0 Total
1st 1.9 1.9 1st
2nd 0.2 23.4 41.8 65.3 2nd
3rd 1.5 21.9 23.4 3rd
4th 0.0 3.4 5.0 8.5 4th
5th 0.1 0.8 0.9 5th
6th 0.1 0.0 0.1 6th
7th 0.0 0.0 7th
8th 8th
9th 9th
10th 10th
11th 11th
12th 12th
13th 13th
14th 14th
15th 15th
16th 16th
17th 17th
18th 18th
Total 0.2 5.9 50.2 43.7 Total



Big Ten Regular Season Championship

Record Champion Total Outright 2-Way 3-Way 4-Way 5-Way 6-Way 7-Way 8-Way
20-0
19-1
18-2
17-3
16-4 4.4% 1.9    0.7 1.0 0.3
15-5 0.0%
14-6 0.0%
13-7 0.0%
12-8
11-9
10-10
Total 1.9% 1.9 0.7 1.0 0.3



NCAA Tournament Selection

Conf RecordRecord ChanceTourney
Bid
AutoAt-LargeAvg
Seed
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 No Bid At-Large if not Auto
20-0
19-1
18-2
17-3
16-4 43.7% 100.0% 23.4% 76.6% 2.0 11.8 21.1 9.0 1.8 0.1 100.0%
15-5 50.2% 100.0% 18.5% 81.5% 2.7 5.6 17.3 17.5 8.7 1.1 0.0 100.0%
14-6 5.9% 100.0% 14.5% 85.5% 3.2 0.2 1.2 2.2 1.8 0.5 0.0 100.0%
13-7 0.2% 100.0% 4.8% 95.2% 4.2 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 100.0%
12-8
11-9
10-10
9-11
8-12
7-13
6-14
5-15
4-16
3-17
2-18
1-19
0-20
Total 100% 100.0% 20.4% 79.6% 2.4 100.0%


Best / Worst Case Scenarios

ChanceTourney
Bid
Avg
Seed
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
Win Out 10.2% 100.0% 1.5 48.4 48.2 3.3
Win Out, Lose in Conf. Tourney Championship 11.2% 100.0% 1.9 29.0 56.0 14.0 1.0
Win Out, Lose in Conf. Tourney Semi-Final 12.8% 100.0% 2.2 19.3 48.4 27.5 4.8